Validation of Analytical Procedures: Graphic and Calculated Criteria for Assessment of Methods Linearity in Practice

Author:

Epshtein N. A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center of registration and development of medicines LLC «IRVIN 2»

Abstract

Introduction. «Linearity» is one of the required characteristics when validating analytical procedures. The issues of the validation of linearity procedures are still relevant.Aim. To consider the main graphical and calculated criteria for confirmation of the linearity of analytical procedures and their restrictions, as well as to give recommendations.Materials and methods. Statistical calculations were performed using MS Excel. Experimental data were obtained by HPLC.Results and discussion. The main criteria for proving/confirming the linearity of analytical procedures and their restrictions are considered in detail. It is shown that these criteria cannot always give a reliable assessment of the linearity of the procedure, the possible reasons for this are indicated and recommendations are given.Conclusion. When validating the procedures, it is necessary to prove/confirm their linearity by using two, and, more reliably, three criteria, one of which must be the linearity of the plot of measured response (Y) vs concentration of the tested substance (C). On the other hand, we demonstrate here that a formal approach should not be used for the estimation of non-linearity of the procedure when using graphical and calculation criteria based on mathematical statistics, since they do not take into account the possibility of practical insignificance of small deviations from the linear dependence of Yon C.

Publisher

Center of Pharmaceutical Analytics Ltd

Subject

Drug Discovery,Pharmaceutical Science

Reference31 articles.

1. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1). ICH, 2005; 13.

2. United States Pharmacopoeia. <1225> Validation of compendial procedures. USP40–NF35. 2017; 1640–1646.

3. State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation XIV edition, 2018, V.1; 276-288 (in Russ.).

4. Green J. М. А Practical Guide to Analytical Method Validation. Analytical Chemistry News & Features. 1996; 1: 305А-309А. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac961912f.

5. Epstein N. A. Evaluation of the suitability (validation) of HPLC techniques in pharmaceutical analysis (Review). Chemical Pharmaceutical Journal. 2004; 38 (4): 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:phac.0000038422.27193.6c

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3