Affiliation:
1. University of Buenos Aires; National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (IIP-CONICET)
2. Institute for Political Research - National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (IIP-CONICET)
Abstract
Unlike most Latin American nations, Argentina experienced a situation of partisan political stability in a context of consistently deteriorating macroeconomic conditions. Other countries in the region, meanwhile, have suffered profound crises and political transformations with notable stability in macroeconomic indicators. That is why the article investigates the causes of this paradox experienced by Argentina and aims to identify the causes of this institutional political stability that is maintained despite the macroeconomic disorder, the strong polarization and the deterioration of the social situation. To carry out this task, the article details the situation of the countries of the region based on the study of various economic indicators and then describes the political and economic situation in Argentina.
Publisher
Moscow State Institute of International Relations
Reference25 articles.
1. Abal Medina, Juan Manuel. “De 1916 a la actualidad: gobiernos, modelos de desarrollo, consensos y desafíos.” In La democracia argentina en el último siglo, edited by Abal Medina, J. M. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA, 2018.
2. Abal Medina, Juan Manuel. “Peronism back in Power in Argentina: Economic Crisis and Political Stability.” Latin American Policy 11, no. 1 (2020): 148–153.
3. Abramowitz, A. I., and K. L. Saunders. “Is polarization a myth?.” The Journal of Politics 70, no. 2 (2008): 542–555.
4. Barbosa-Filho, Nelson. “De Dilma a Bolsonaro: la política económica de Brasil de 2011 a 2019.” El trimestre económico 87, no. 347 (2020): 597–634.
5. Castiglioni, Rossana. “El ocaso del ‘modelo chileno.’” Interciencia 44, no. 10 (2019): 4–14.