Affiliation:
1. National Research University Higher School of Economics
Abstract
In this article, the author compares the objective dynamics of changes in the state of the water problem since the beginning of the 21st century, which has continued to worsen in most regions of the world, and its foreign policy dimension, noting the transition from the global water alarmism of the 1990s to the challenges for small and medium powers, in solving the problems in which no major actor is yet actively interested. Fresh water, despite the slogans at the end of the last century about future water wars, the “blue oil” and the “new gold” of the 21ST century, has not become, and is unlikely to become, the cause of confrontation between great powers, while medium and small powers are still confine themselves to more traditional forms of conflict, including in the Tigris, the Euphrates and the Jordan basins, which have been seen for decades as a testing ground for future water wars. This does not negate the role of water bodies and ecosystems in promoting development or, conversely, in perpetuating the poverty and backwardness in entire regions. Waters remain in competition as an important source of water-intensive goods that can be converted into valuable assets – water-intensive goods, energy or the ability to achieve higher levels of the Human Development Index. And, of course, they can be used to exacerbate ethnic and political conflicts. This is where the potential of Russia, the world’s second water power, comes into play, both in terms of directly regulating regional water challenges and in influencing the approaches of international organizations and associations, in which Moscow plays a prominent role.
Publisher
Moscow State Institute of International Relations
Reference9 articles.
1. Torkunov, A.V. “Mir stanovitsya drugim,” Mir i politika, no. 1 (2009): 6–20 [In Russian].
2. Bernauer, Thomas, and Anna Kalbhenn. “The Politics of International Freshwater Resources.” In Potential Global Strategic Catastrophes: Balancing Transnational Responsibilities and Burden-sharing with Sovereignty and Human Dignity, edited by Nayef R.F. Al-Rodhan. Berlin: LIT, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1321034.
3. Dinar, Ariel, Dinar, Shlomi, McCaffrey, Stephen, and Daene McKinney. Bridges over Water: Understanding Transboundary Water Conflict, Negotiation and Cooperation.” River Edge, NJ: World Scientific 3, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1142/6184.
4. Hamner, Jesse H. “Until the Well is Dry: International Conflict and Cooperation over Scarce Water Resources.” Phd diss. Emory University, 2008.
5. Kalpakian, Jack. Identity, Conflict and Cooperation in International River Systems. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2004.