Change of factual circumstances in the context of the issuance of judicial acts in civil cases

Author:

Ryzhkov K. S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ural Branch of the Russian State University of Justice

Abstract

The subject of the study within the framework of this article are the norms of civil procedural law and arbitration procedural law concerning the issuance of judicial acts in connection with a change in factual circumstances relevant to the case. The purpose of the study is to identify and classify cases in which the current legislation and law enforcement practice allow the issuance of a new judicial act in connection with a change in the actual circumstances of the case. At the same time, the purpose of the study is related to the confirmation of the hypothesis about the diversity of the bases of such a classification.Within the framework of this study, the functional method, the system-structural method, the formal-legal method and the hermeneutic method were used. The use of these methods is due to the need to analyze a large volume of legal norms and judicial practice on the subject of the study. The article analyzes the legal mechanisms, the application of which is associated with the issuance of judicial acts in the framework of civil and arbitration proceedings based on changes in the factual circumstances of the case. The following mechanisms are identified as these mechanisms: the possibility of filing a claim with a new basis, revision of judicial acts under new circumstances, changing the method and procedure for the execution of a court decision, postponement and installment of the execution of a court decision, indexation of the amounts awarded.Cases of application of these mechanisms are classified according to the procedural order of consideration by the court of changes in circumstances and its consolidation in judicial acts, while the following types are distinguished: cases related to the consolidation of circumstances by making a new court decision on a claim with a new basis; cases related to the consolidation of circumstances by making a court ruling in connection with the emergence of new circumstances; cases related to the consolidation of circumstances by issuing a court ruling in connection with a change in the method and procedure for the execution of a court decision, postponement and installment of the execution of a court decision, indexation of the amounts awarded. Cases of the use of these mechanisms are also classified by the type of judicial act fixing such changes, while the following types are distinguished: cases related to the consolidation of circumstances by issuing a court decision; cases related to the consolidation of circumstances by issuing a court ruling.The author concludes that the use of the term "new circumstances" is incorrect in relation to certain grounds for reviewing judicial acts, in connection with which it is proposed to amend the norms of procedural legislation. In relation to these cases, it is proposed to use not the term "new circumstances", but the term "change in the content of legal norms or their interpretation that is relevant to the case".Based on the above, the purpose of the study has been fully achieved.

Publisher

Dostoevsky Omsk State University

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference19 articles.

1. Yakovlev V.F. From reforming to improving the judicial and arbitration system, strengthening the independ-ence of the judiciary (Presentation of the report of the Chairman of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation V.F. Yakovlev at the meeting on the results of the work of arbitration courts in 1997, held on February 12, 1998), in: Yakovlev V.F. Selected works, in 3 volumes, Moscow, Statut Publ., 2013, Vol. 3: Arbitration courts: For-mation and development, pp. 239–251. (In Russ.).

2. Vishnevsky G.A. Principle Res Judicata as a Necessary Condition for Providing Justice. Sovremennoe pravo, 2013, no. 11, pp. 76–83. (In Russ.).

3. Terekhov V.V. A notion and a meaning of the "res judicata" category in the russian and foreign civil proce-dure. Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Russian Juridical Journal, 2014, no. 5 (98), pp. 203–209. (In Russ.).

4. Ivakin V.N. On Legal Basis of a Claim. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2021, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 107–116. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2021.132.11.107-116. (In Russ.).

5. Ivakin V.N. A Factual Ground of a Cause of Action: A Concept and Elements. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2020, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 74–82. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2020.113.4.074-082. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3