Early termination of a judge's powers as a measure of legal responsibility: problems of legal regulation and law enforcement

Author:

Glazunova I. V.1,Nikitina A. V.2

Affiliation:

1. Dostoevsky Omsk State University

2. Far Eastern Branch of Russian State University of Justice; Judges Qualification Board of the Khabarovsk Territory

Abstract

The subject of the study is the theoretical, legislative and practical application problems of the early termination of a judge as a measure of legal responsibility. According to the authors' opinion there are several problems: the lack of scientific and legislative unity on the issue of the sectoral nature of this measure; the unsystematic, uncoordinated nature of legislation and law enforcement practice; the apparent discrepancy of the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Status of Judges in the Russian Federation” (hereinafter - the Status of Judges) which regulates the grounds and procedure for the early termination of the powers of a judge and the practice of its application to the fundamental principles of legal responsibility.The aim of this article is to make recommendations aimed at improving the legal regulation and practice of such a legal liability measure as early termination of the power of the judge.The methodology. The main method of research is the general scientific dialectical method of cognition, using universal scientific methods: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, formal-logical and systemic. The specific scientific methods are applied: the formal legal method, the methods of legal modelling and the methods of forecasting.Main results and field of application. The authors concluded that the early termination of a power of judge, for whatever reason, is related to his or her illegal behaviour. It should be explicitly recognized as a measure of legal responsibility in the Status of Judges. It is necessary that the legal grounds for judge early termination meet the requirements of legal certainty. The application of this measure is based on the fundamental principles of legal responsibility: justice, humanism, legal equality, proportionality of the sanction to the degree of social danger of the act committed, individualization of the punishment, etc. The Status of Judges and the Regulation on the functioning of the qualification collegium of Judges should be supplemented by legal provisions governing the procedure for applying to a judge early termination as a measure of legal liability that does not involve the commission of a disciplinary offence. A fair, public and adversarial procedure must be used to ensure that judges in the high and medium courts can terminated early. The rules for this procedure must be laid down in federal constitutional law.Conclusions. The implementation of such proposals would lead to the formation of legislation and the law enforcement practice, consistent with the main principles of legal responsibility and the basic provisions of its theory. It would guarantee the fairness and predictability of decisions towards judges. Ultimately it would ensure an appropriate balance between the independence of judges and their accountability for gross and systematic violations incompatible with the status of judges.

Publisher

Dostoevsky Omsk State University

Reference22 articles.

1. Kleandrov M.I. Constitutional responsibility of judge: matter of day after-tomorrow?. Zhurnal konstitut-sionnogo pravosudiya = Journal of Constitutional Justice, 2012, no. 2, pp. 1–8. (In Russ.).

2. Drozdov A.G., Kainov V.I. Disciplinary responsibility of judges: history, theory, practice, Monograph. Moscow, Berlin, Direkt-Media Publ., 2020. 186 p. (In Russ.).

3. Kleandrov M.I. Judicial Ethical Responsibility Mechanism: Issues of Formation, Monograph. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2019. 240 p. (In Russ.).

4. Kornakova S.V., Shcherbakova I.A. Constitutional and legal bases of the status of judges of the Russian Fed-eration, Monograph. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2019. 157 p. (In Russ.).

5. Vinogradov V.A. Constitutional and legal responsibility: a systematic study, Doct. Diss. Thesis, Moscow, 2005. 48 p. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3