Background Independence and Quantum Causal Structure

Author:

Parker Lachlan1,Costa Fabio1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, QLD 4072 Australia

Abstract

One of the key ways in which quantum mechanics differs from relativity is that it requires a fixed background reference frame for spacetime. In fact, this appears to be one of the main conceptual obstacles to uniting the two theories. Additionally, a combination of the two theories is expected to yield non-classical, or "indefinite", causal structures. In this paper, we present a background-independent formulation of the process matrix formalism – a form of quantum mechanics that allows for indefinite causal structure – while retaining operationally well-defined measurement statistics. We do this by postulating an arbitrary probability distribution of measurement outcomes across discrete "chunks" of spacetime, which we think of as physical laboratories, and then requiring that this distribution be invariant under any permutation of laboratories. We find (a) that one still obtains nontrivial, indefinite causal structures with background independence, (b) that we lose the idea of local operations in distinct laboratories, but can recover it by encoding a reference frame into the physical states of our system, and (c) that permutation invariance imposes surprising symmetry constraints that, although formally similar to a superselection rule, cannot be interpreted as such.

Funder

Australian Research Council

Publisher

Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften

Subject

Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous),Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Reference53 articles.

1. Jeremy Butterfield and Christopher J. Isham. ``Space-time and the philosophical challenge of quantum gravity''. Pages 33–89. Cambridge University Press. (1999). arXiv:gr-qc/9903072.

2. Lucien Hardy. ``Probability theories with dynamic causal structure: A New framework for quantum gravity'' (2005). arXiv:gr-qc/0509120.

3. Ognyan Oreshkov, Fabio Costa, and Časlav Brukner. ``Quantum correlations with no causal order''. Nat. Commun. 3 (2012).

4. C. Rovelli. ``What is observable in classical and quantum gravity?''. Class. Quantum Grav. 8 (1991).

5. John D. Norton. ``The Hole Argument''. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2019). Summer 2019 edition.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3