Features of Effective Clinical Competency Committees

Author:

Rowland Kathleen1ORCID,Edberg Deborah2ORCID,Anderson Lauren3ORCID,Wright Katherine4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kathleen Rowland, MD, MS, is Associate Professor and Vice Chair for Education, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Rush University

2. Deborah Edberg, MD, is Director of GME Development, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Rush University

3. Lauren Anderson, PhD, MEd, is Director of Educational Programs, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Rush University; and

4. Katherine Wright, PhD, MPH, is Director of Research, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Abstract

Background The Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) provides accountability to the general public that physicians completing a training program have achieved competence. CCC processes and features that best identify resident outcomes along a developmental spectrum are not well described. Objective This study sought to describe CCC features associated with effective and efficient CCC performance. Methods The study was conducted as part of the 2022 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance survey of family medicine residency program directors. The survey assessed CCC methods, policies, faculty development, structure, and overall CCC time required. The outcomes were identification of residents along a spectrum of development, from failing to exceeding expectations. Ordinal logistic regressions were used to explore the relationship between CCC characteristics and CCC outcomes. Results The response rate was 43.3% (291 of 672). Eighty-nine percent (258 of 291) of program directors reported their CCC is successful in identifying residents not meeting expectations; 69.3% (201 of 290) agree their CCC identifies residents who are exceeding expectations. Programs with written policies for synthesizing data (OR=2.53; 95% CI 1.22-5.22; P=.012) and written policies for resident feedback (OR=19.91; 95% CI 3.72-106.44; P<.001) were more likely to report successfully identifying residents below expectations. Programs whose members spent fewer than 3 hours per 6-month interval on CCC meetings were less likely to report being able to identify failing residents (OR=0.37; 95% CI 0.19-0.72; P=.004). Conclusions This survey of family medicine program directors suggests that formal policies, faculty development, and adequate time for CCC faculty are associated with an effective CCC, especially if goals beyond “identifying failure” are desired.

Publisher

Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Subject

General Medicine,Education

Reference10 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3