Caring for Each Other: A Resident-Led Peer Debriefing Skills Workshop

Author:

Lee Grace S.1ORCID,Dizon Samantha E.2ORCID,Feeney Colby D.3ORCID,Lee Yu-Lin Amy4,Jordan Megan5ORCID,Galanos Anthony N.6ORCID,Trinh Jane V.7

Affiliation:

1. Grace S. Lee, MD, is a Chief Resident, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine

2. Samantha E. Dizon, MD, is a Cardiology Fellow, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center

3. Colby D. Feeney, MD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, and Program Director, Internal Medicine and Pediatrics Residency Program, Duke University School of Medicine

4. Yu-Lin Amy Lee, MD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine

5. Megan Jordan, MD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine

6. Anthony N. Galanos, MD, is Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine

7. Jane V. Trinh, MD, is Associate Professor, Department of Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, and Chief, Division of Med-Peds, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Inadequate time and space to process critical incidents contribute to burnout. Residents do not regularly participate in emotional debriefs. An institutional needs assessment revealed only 11% of surveyed pediatrics and combined medicine-pediatrics residents had participated in a debrief. Objective The primary objective was to increase resident comfort in participation in peer debriefs after critical incidents from 30% to 50% with implementation of a resident-led peer debriefing skills workshop. Secondary objectives included increasing resident likelihood of leading debriefs and comfort in identifying symptoms of emotional distress. Methods Internal medicine, pediatrics, and medicine-pediatrics residents were surveyed for baseline participation in debriefs and comfort in leading peer debriefs. Two senior residents became trained debrief facilitators and led a 50-minute peer debriefing skills workshop for co-residents. Pre- and post-workshop surveys assessed participant comfort in and likelihood of leading peer debriefs. Surveys distributed 6 months post-workshop assessed resident debrief participation. We implemented the Model for Improvement from 2019 to 2022. Results Forty-six (77%) and 44 (73%) of the 60 participants completed the pre- and post-workshop surveys. Post-workshop, residents' reported comfort in leading debriefs increased from 30% to 91%. The likelihood of leading a debrief increased from 51% to 91%. Ninety-five percent (42 of 44) agreed that formal training in debriefing is beneficial. Almost 50% (24 of 52) of surveyed residents preferred to debrief with a peer. Six months post-workshop, 22% (15 of 68) of surveyed residents had led a peer debrief. Conclusions Many residents prefer to debrief with a peer after critical incidents that cause emotional distress. Resident-led workshops can improve resident comfort in peer debriefing.

Publisher

Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Subject

General Medicine,Education

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3