Learning From the 2021 Ophthalmology Match: Virtual Residency Matching During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Aggarwal Sahil1,Wisely C. Ellis2,Syed Misha3,Siatkowski R. Michael4,Challa Pratap5

Affiliation:

1. Sahil Aggarwal, MD, is Chief Resident, PGY-4, Duke Eye Center

2. C. Ellis Wisely, MD, MBA, is Assistant Professor, Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Duke Eye Center, and Site Director, Ophthalmology Resident Service, Durham VA Medical Center

3. Misha Syed, MD, MEHP, is Assistant Dean for Educational Affairs, Vice Chair for Academic Affairs, and Residency Program Director, Ophthalmology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, and Member, Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology

4. R. Michael Siatkowski, MD, is CEO, Chair, and Professor, Dean McGee Eye Institute, The University of Oklahoma, and Member, Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology

5. Pratap Challa, MD, is Professor and Residency Program Director, Duke Eye Center, and Member, Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The effect of virtual interviews on residency match outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. Examining the ophthalmology match may help inform all specialties undergoing virtual interviews. Objective To determine the impact of allopathic applicant match characteristics in the first year of the virtual residency Match process. Methods Using the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology match database, a retrospective review was conducted of all allopathic applicants to ophthalmology residency programs in the United States from the 2016 through the 2021 match cycles. Demographic information, interview numbers, and match outcomes were compared between the 2016-2020 (in-person) and 2021 (virtual) cycles. Results A total of 3343 allopathic applicants were analyzed. Applicants in the 2021 Match applied to significantly more programs than 2016-2020 applicants did (78.7±23.6 vs 73.1±22.7, P<.001). Among matched and unmatched applicants, there was no significant difference in the number of interviews granted or completed. There was a significant reduction in the match rate between the 2016-2020 and 2021 Match cycles (81.3% vs 76.6%, P=.0009). A subanalysis of applicants who went to medical schools with ophthalmology residency programs (N=2308) found that the home institution match rate was significantly higher for the 2021 Match compared to the aggregate 2016-2020 Matches (26.1% vs 20.6%, respectively, P=.015). Conclusions Significantly more applicants to ophthalmology residency programs matched at their home institutions in the 2021 virtual match cycle compared to the previous 5 years without influencing the interview numbers granted and attended.

Publisher

Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Subject

General Medicine,Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3