Interruptions to Attending Physician Rounds and Their Effect on Resident Education

Author:

Armendariz Julia1,Tamayo Carla2,Slade Justin3,Belitskaya-Lévy Ilana4,Gray Caroline5,Allaudeen Nazima6

Affiliation:

1. At the time of research, Julia Armendariz, MD, was an Internal Medicine Resident, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, and is now an Internal Medicine Physician, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System

2. At the time of research, Carla Tamayo, MD, was an Internal Medicine Resident, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, and is now an Internal Medicine Physician, San Juan, Puerto Rico

3. At the time of research, Justin Slade, MD, was Physician Scholar in Quality and Patient Safety, Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, and is now a Cardiology Fellow, Department of Cardiology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco

4. Ilana Belitskaya-Lévy, PhD, is a Biostatistician, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System

5. Caroline Gray, PhD, is Research Sociologist, Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System

6. Nazima Allaudeen, MD, is Assistant Professor (Affiliated), Stanford School of Medicine, and Director of Quality Improvement, Inpatient Medicine, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Daily attending rounds (AR) are a cornerstone of teaching and patient care in academic health centers. Interruptions in health care are common and can cause increased risk of errors, incomplete work, and decreased decision-making accuracy. Interruptions to AR may diminish a trainee's capacity to learn and retain information. Objective We characterized and quantified interruptions that occur during AR. Methods We used a mixed-methods design combining a prospective observational study with a qualitative study. AR were observed January to March 2020 to characterize interruptions, followed by semi-structured interviews with the observed physicians to elucidate the effect of interruptions on workflow and the educational value of rounds. Results There were 378 observed interruptions over the course of 30 AR sessions, averaging 12.6 (range 1–22, median 13) interruptions per rounding session. Bedside nursing staff was the most common source of interruptions (25%) and consultant recommendations was the most common topic of interruption (21%). Most interruptions occurred during patient presentations (76%), and the most common method of interaction was text message (24%). Most team members described negative effects of interruptions, including loss of focus and missing critical clinical information; some also reported that certain interruptions had positive effects on education and clinical care. Interns were more likely to report negative emotional reactions to interruptions. Conclusions AR are frequently interrupted for non-urgent topics by a variety of methods and sources. Negative effects included loss of focus, missed information, and increased stress. Proactive communication, particularly between physicians and nurses, was suggested to reduce interruptions.

Publisher

Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3