Unheard Voices: A Qualitative Study of Resident Perspectives on Remediation

Author:

Krzyzaniak Sara M.1,Kaplan Bonnie2,Lucas Daniella3,Bradley Elizabeth4,Wolf Stephen J.5

Affiliation:

1. Sara M. Krzyzaniak, MD, is Clinical Associate Professor and Residency Program Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University

2. Bonnie Kaplan, MD, MS, is Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, and Residency Program Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center

3. Daniella Lucas, MD, is a Resident, Department of Emergency Medicine, Cook County Health and Hospitals System

4. Elizabeth Bradley, PhD, is Associate Professor of Medical Education, University of Virginia School of Medicine

5. Stephen J. Wolf, MD, is Professor and Vice Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, and Director of Service, Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Remediation is an important component of residency training that ensures residents are progressing toward competency and unsupervised practice. There is literature describing educators' attitudes about remediation; however, little is known about residents' perspectives regarding peers who are struggling and remediation. Understanding this perspective is critical to supporting struggling residents and developing successful remediation programs. Objective The objective of this study was to describe residents' perspectives on peers who are struggling and remediation processes within graduate medical education programs. Methods In 2015, we conducted focus groups of residents in a multi-institutional exploratory qualitative study designed to investigate resident perspectives on remediation. Focus groups included questions on identification of residents who are struggling, reasons residents face difficulty in training, attitudes toward remediation, and understanding of the remediation process. Using conventional content analysis, we analyzed the focus group data to discover common themes. Results Eight focus groups were performed at 3 geographically distinct institutions. A total of 68 residents participated, representing 12 distinct medical specialties. Four major themes emerged from the participants' discussion: lack of transparency, negative stigma, overwhelming emotions, and a need for change. Conclusions Resident perspectives on remediation are affected by communication, culture, and emotions. The resident participants called for change, seeking greater understanding and transparency about what it means to struggle and the process of remediation. The residents also believed that remediation can be embraced and normalized.

Publisher

Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3