Reassessing the Exploitation Charge in Sweatshop Labor
-
Published:2023-10-17
Issue:68
Volume:23
Page:221-240
-
ISSN:1847-6139
-
Container-title:Croatian journal of philosophy
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Croat. j. philos. (Online)
Author:
Kuyumcuoğlu Huseyin S.
Abstract
One common argument against sweatshops is that they are exploitative. Exploitation is taken as sufficient reason to condemn sweatshops as unjust and to argue that sweatshop owners have a moral duty to offer better working conditions to their employees. In this article, I argue that any exploitation theory falls short of covering all standard cases of sweatshops as exploitative. In going through the most prominent theories of exploitation, I explain why any given sweatshop can either be wrongfully exploitative or not, depending on the exploitation theory being considered and the circumstances of the application. I conclude by suggesting that sweatshop critics had better find other reasons besides the charge of exploitation to protest or interfere with these workplaces.
Publisher
Institute of Philosophy in Zagreb, Croatia