Author:
Zarouali Brahim,Helberger Natali,De Vreese Claes H.
Abstract
Algorithms are widely used in our data-driven media landscape. Many misconceptions have arisen about how these algorithms work and what they can do. In this study, we conducted a large representative survey (<em>N</em> = 2,106) in the Netherlands to explore algorithmic misconceptions. Results showed that a significant part of the general population holds (multiple) misconceptions about algorithms in the media. We found that erroneous beliefs about algorithms are more common among (1) older people (vs. younger people), (2) lower-educated people (vs. higher-educated), and (3) women (vs. men). In addition, it was found that people who had no specific sources to inform themselves about algorithms, and those relying on their friends/family for information, were more likely to have algorithmic misconceptions. Conversely, media channels, school, and having one’s own (online) experiences were found to be sources associated with having fewer algorithmic misconceptions. Theoretical implications are formulated in the context of algorithmic awareness and the digital divide. Finally, societal implications are discussed, such as the need for algorithmic literacy initiatives.
Reference57 articles.
1. Amoore, L., & Piotukh, V. (2015). Life beyond big data: Governing with little analytics. Economy and Society, 44(3), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1043793
2. Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645
3. Beckett, C. (2019, November 18). New powers, new responsibilities: A global survey of journalism and artificial intelligence. Polis. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2019/11/18/new-powers-new-responsibilities
4. Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147
5. Bucher, T. (2018). If…then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献