Author:
Brantner Cornelia,Rodríguez-Amat Joan Ramon,Belinskaya Yulia
Abstract
This article updates certain aspects of the normative notions of the public sphere. The complex ecosystem of social communications enhanced by mobile media platform activity has changed our perception of space. If the public sphere has to normatively assess the expected conditions for public debate and for democracy, the assemblage of devices, discourses, infrastructures, locations, and regulations must be considered together. The literature reviewed about the public sphere, spaces, and geographically-enabled mobile media leads this article to the formulation of a concept of the public sphere that considers such assemblage as an interface. As an empirically applicable update to the definition of the public sphere the text offers a model that helps analyze those factors considering how they shape the communicative space in four modes: representations, structures, textures, and connections. These modes consider the roles played by assemblages of devices, infrastructures, and content in delimiting the circulation of information. The second part of the article illustrates the model with examples from previous research, paying particular attention to the structures’ mode. The dissection of qualitative, quantitative, and geodata generated by digital and (visual) (n)ethnographic tools reveals three subcategories for the analysis of structures of space: barriers, shifts, and flows. The structures effectively enable/disable communication and define centers and peripheries in the activity flows. The contribution of this article is, thus, conceptual—it challenges and updates the notion of the public sphere; and methodological—it offers tools and outputs that align with the previously developed theoretical framework.
Reference63 articles.
1. Abernathy, D. (2017). Using geodata and geolocation in the social sciences: Mapping our connected world. Sage.
2. Adams, P. C., & Jansson, A. (2012). Communication geography: A bridge between disciplines. Communication Theory, 22(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01406.x
3. Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt.
4. Barreneche, C. (2012). Governing the geocoded world: Environmentality and the politics of location platforms. Convergence, 18(3), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856512442764
5. Belinskaya, Y., Brantner, C., & Rodriguez-Amat, J. R. (2019). Revisitando la esfera pública (urbana): Un modelo de análisis [Revisiting the (urban) public sphere: A model for analysis]. Sonido, 9(20), 106–133.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献