Social Encounter by Experiment? Potentials and Pitfalls of Real-World Labs for Urban Planning

Author:

Räuchle Charlotte

Abstract

This article explores the potential of real-world labs (RWLs) and real-world experiments (RWEs) to be a fruitful addition to established approaches in urban planning in Germany. While transdisciplinary and transformative RWLs rooted in socio-ecological sustainability studies have become an important tool for experimenting with innovative solutions for environmental challenges in cities, RWLs aimed at improving social cohesion in neighbourhoods and fostering a communal life characterised by dialogue and solidarity are rare. To this latter aim, this article contributes with research experience from a transdisciplinary RWL on cooperative urban open space development seeking to foster social cohesion in super-diverse neighbourhoods in Germany. This article analyses the contradictory perceptions of the local stakeholders involved as regards the potentials of RWEs to be a meaningful addition to established planning practices. This article makes it clear that there is greater proximity between urban planning theory, practice, and RWEs than initially assumed. Nevertheless, RWEs have considerable potential as a positive complement to established approaches to urban planning and as a means of experimenting with open-ended encounter formats in neighbourhoods.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Urban Studies

Reference58 articles.

1. Abbott, J. (2005). Understanding and managing the unknown: The nature of uncertainty in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(3), 237–251.

2. Albrechts, L. (1991). Changing roles and positions of planners. Urban Studies, 28(123), 123–137.

3. Altrock, U. (2014). Das Ende der Angebotsplanung? Instrumente der Planung im Wandel [The end of the offer planning? Planning instruments in change]. In P. Küpper, M. Levin-Keitel, F. Maus, P. Müller, S. Reimann, M. Sondermann, . . . T. Wiegand (Eds.), Raumentwicklung 3.0: Gemeinsam die Zukunft der räumlichen Planung gestalten [Spatial development 3.0: Shaping the future of spatial planning together] (pp. 15–32). Hanover: ARL.

4. Amin, A. (2002). Ethnicity and the multicultural city: Living with diversity. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 34(6), 959–980.

5. Banovetz, J. M. (1971). The city and change: Programming for control. In J. M. Banovetz (Ed.), Managing the modern city (pp. 134–150). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3