Google’s Influence on Global Business Models in Journalism: An Analysis of Its Innovation Challenge

Author:

Hermida AlfredORCID,Young Mary Lynn

Abstract

This study investigates how Google is shaping journalism innovation, particularly in business models, through an analysis of one of its global funding competitions, the Innovation Challenge. It adds to an understanding of the impact of platforms on journalism through a descriptive analysis of 354 projects funded between 2018 and 2022 in 78 countries and five regions. Grant recipients were largely for-profit journalism organizations, with a significant US focus. Projects related to audience engagement, business models and distribution dominated the published winning innovation proposals, accounting for 72.6% of funded projects. The three areas were closely connected as they were mostly related to plans to increase reader revenue. Findings suggest that the Innovation Challenge validates reader revenue as the key innovation in business models through a funding competition aligned with Google’s global industry and government relations interests. The orientation is problematic as it narrows journalism innovation to a financial issue, with audiences as the answer, even though people are largely unwilling to pay for news and journalism is considered a public good rather than simply a commercial product.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Communication

Reference48 articles.

1. Anderson, E. (2017). Private government: How employers rule our lives (and why we don’t talk about it). Princeton University Press.

2. Beddoe, K. (2018, November 21). Google News Initiative kicks off Asia-Pacific Innovation Challenge. Google India Blog. https://india.googleblog.com/2018/11/google-news-initiative-kicks-off-asia.html

3. Bell, E. J., Owen, T., Brown, P. D., Hauka, C., & Rashidian, N. (2017). The platform press: How Silicon Valley reengineered journalism. Tow Center for Digital Journalism. https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/platform-press-how-silicon-valley-reengineered-journalism.php

4. Benson, R. (2018). Can foundations solve the journalism crisis? Journalism, 19(8), 1059–1077. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917724612

5. Benson, S. (2023, August 16). A “neutron bomb” to the industry: Newsrooms begin feeling impact of Meta ban, call for Competition Bureau inquiry and end to C-18 standoff. The Hill Times. https://www.hilltimes.com/story/2023/08/16/a-neutron-bomb-to-the-industry-newsrooms-begin-feeling-impact-of-meta-ban-call-for-competition-bureau-inquiry-and-end-to-c-18-standoff/395073

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3