Abstract
The organization, management, and production of urban space through digital information and communication technologies have become a central means for governing urban life. To overcome a lack of citizen-centered practices in today’s smart cities, governments and municipalities institutionalize citizen-centered digital infrastructures such as Decidim, a digital infrastructure proposing non-corporate, decentralized, and collaborative forms of digital production to evoke participatory governance practices and ultimately social transformation (Barandiaran et al., 2018). Swiss city administrations have adapted the Decidim platform for participatory budgeting processes and city-wide participation platforms since 2019. This article explores the process of institutional adoption, focusing on how the use of Decidim impacts local practices and negotiations for governing urban space. The examination of the Decidim platform in the Swiss cities of Zurich and Lucerne will be framed by re-conceptualizing Lefebvre’s right to the city in the age of digital transformation. The findings show that for a successful introduction of the Decidim platform based on principles of the right to the city (a) local needs for a new digital democratic instrument need to be pre-existent, (b) government employees must implement a scope of action which allows organized civil society and grassroots initiatives to appropriate the infrastructure for their own purposes, and (c) local practices of hybrid communication and organizing must be aligned with the structure of the platform. Nevertheless, digital participation tools such as Decidim cannot solve entrenched inequalities such as the financialization of land, the issue of disadvantaged neighborhoods, or the absence of voting rights for certain communities. Therefore, city administrations need to integrate hybrid participation strategies which prioritise collective power over distributive power as well as tackle urban inequalities through political means.
Reference56 articles.
1. Alevizou, G. (2020). Civic media and technologies of belonging: Where digital citizenship and “the right to the city” converge. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 16(3), 269–290.
2. Amt für Städtebau. (2022). Testplanung Seeufer Wollishofen. Abschlussbericht. https://www.stadt-zuerich.ch/hbd/de/index/staedtebau/planung/entwicklungsgebiete/seeufer-wollishofen.html#schlussbericht
3. Anastasiu, I. (2019). Unpacking the smart city through the lens of the right to the city: A taxonomy as a way forward in participatory city-making. In M. de Lange & M. de Waal (Eds.), The hackable city: Digital media and collaborative city-making in the network society (pp. 239–260). Springer.
4. Arroub, A., Zahi, B., Sabir, E., & Sadik, M. (2016, October 26–29). A literature review on smart cities: Paradigms, opportunities and open problems [Paper presentation]. 2016 International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications, Fez, Morocco.
5. Ash, J., Kitchin, R., & Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–43.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献