Sharing and Space-Commoning Knowledge Through Urban Living Labs Across Different European Cities
Author:
Petrescu DoinaORCID, Cermeño HelenaORCID, Keller Carsten, Moujan Carola, Belfield Andrew, Koch FlorianORCID, Goff Denise, Schalk MeikeORCID, Bernhardt Floris
Abstract
While the growing commodification of housing and public spaces in European cities is producing urban inequalities affecting mostly migrant and vulnerable populations, there are also manifold small-scale neighbourhood-based collaborative processes that seek to co-produce shared urban resources and contribute to more resilient urban developments. As part of the ProSHARE research project that investigates conditions in which <em>sharing</em> takes place and can be expanded to less-represented populations, we focus here on sharing and space-commoning practices within urban living labs. Considered multi-stakeholders sites for innovation, testing, and learning with a strong urban transformative potential, urban living labs have received increasing academic attention in recent years. However, questions related to whether and how labs facilitate processes of exchange and negotiation of knowledge claims and generate spatial knowledge remain largely unexplored. We address this gap by looking at the role urban living labs play in the regeneration of neighbourhoods, asking how sharing and space-commoning practices generate situated spatial knowledge(s) that can be used in planning processes, and what type of settings and methods can facilitate such processes. These questions are addressed in the context of four ProSHARE-Labs located in Berlin, Paris (Bagneux), London, and Vienna, drawing on a cross-case analysis of the functioning of these hubs, the research methods applied in each context, and on the translocal learning and possibilities for upscaling resulting from these parallel experiences.
Reference49 articles.
1. Aquilué, I., Caicedo, A., Moreno, J., Estrada, M., & Pagès, L. (2021). A methodology for assessing the impact of living labs on urban design: The case of the furnish project. Sustainability, 13(8), Article 4562. 2. Atelier Parisien d’Urbanisme. (2021). Data portraits Paris/Grand Paris: Arrondissements, communes, territoires [Data portraits of Paris/Grand Paris: Districts, municipalities, territories]. https://www.apur.org/dataviz/portraits-metropole-grand-paris-cartes 3. Bell, D. M., & Pahl, K. (2018). Co-production: Towards a utopian approach. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(1), 105–117. 4. Bulkeley, H., Marvin, S., Palgan, Y. V., McCormick, K., Breitfuss-Loidl, M., Mai, L., von Wirth, T., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city? European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 317–335. 5. Casas-Cortés, M. I., Osterweil, M., & Powell, D. E. (2008). Blurring boundaries: Recognizing knowledge-practices in the study of social movements. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(1), 17–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30052739
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|