Abstract
This article examines the role of bureaucracy in the process of reforming Moscow’s transportation system. With reliance on the intellectual history of neoliberalism, the concept of “orchestration,” an institutionalist economics, and an empirical case study, I argue that a market embodies itself in the form of bureaucracy. The agency in the provision of norms and regulations, calculations and forecasts, orders of economic exchange, and knowledge production concentrates in the hands of bureaucrats regardless of their formal attachment to state or private entities. Bureaucrats define fundamental issues of how markets should function; they design and control the system of money redistribution. The case of dismantling Moscow’s trolleybus system provides fruitful data on the agency of bureaucracy in transportation reform under the label of implementing “best practice” scenarios favourable to a neoliberal toolkit.
Reference46 articles.
1. Beddeleem, M. (2020). Recoding liberalism: Philosophy and sociology of science against planning. In D. Plehwe, Q. Slobodian, & P. Mirowski (Eds.), Nine lives of neoliberalism (pp. 21–46). Verso.
2. Beukers, E., Bertolini, L., & te Brömmelstroet, M. (2012). Why cost benefit analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: A process perspective. Transportation Research Part A—Policy and Practice, 46(1), 68–78.
3. Blinkin, M., & Vorobyev, A. (2016). Trolleybus: ykhodyaschaya natura. Polit.ru. https://polit.ru/article/2016/04/16/trolleybus
4. Brown, J. (2006). From traffic regulation to limited ways: The effort to build a science of transportation planning. Journal of Planning History, 5(1), 3–34.
5. Bruff, I., & Tansel, C. (Eds.). (2020). Authoritarian neoliberalism. Philosophies, practices, contestations. Routledge.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献