Abstract
How has the youth climate movement in the US grown since the Climate Strikes began and in what ways did it change as it grew? This article takes advantage of a unique dataset that includes surveys from activists who organized the nationally coordinated climate strikes in the US that began with Fridays for Future in spring 2019. Building on the research on alliance building and strategic coalitions, this article analyzes how the patterns of participation changed over the period of the study. We employ social network analysis to map the affiliation networks among the organizers of these events to assess the coalitions of groups involved and the shifting organizational landscape. Our analysis does not provide evidence that groups spanned the boundaries across movements, nor does it show that identity plays a role in coalition building in this movement. Instead, by mapping out the coalition of organizations within this movement and how connections among them change over time, we see clear evidence that this youth-led movement was reoriented by adult-led organizations. Our article concludes by considering how these findings suggest the future trajectory of the youth climate movement and its role in a ‘new climate politics’ in America.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference82 articles.
1. 350.org Team. (2019, September 28). 7.6 million people demand action after week of climate strikes. 350.org Team. Retrieved from https://350.org/7-million-people-demand-action-after-week-of-climate-strikes
2. 350.org Team. (2021, March 24). About 350. 350.org Team. Retrieved from https://350.org/about
3. Adam, E. M. (2017). Intersectional coalitions: The paradoxes of rights-based movement building in LGBTQ and immigrant communities. Law & Society Review, 51(1), 132–167.
4. Arrieta-Kenna, R. (2019, June 16). The Sunrise movement actually changed the democratic conversation: So what do you do for a sequel? Politico. Retrieved from https://politi.co/2WJnIa2
5. Barkan, S. E. (1979). Strategic, tactical and organizational dilemmas of the protest movement against nuclear power. Social Problems, 27(1), 19–37.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献