Shifting Coalitions within the Youth Climate Movement in the US

Author:

Fisher Dana R.ORCID,Nasrin SohanaORCID

Abstract

How has the youth climate movement in the US grown since the Climate Strikes began and in what ways did it change as it grew? This article takes advantage of a unique dataset that includes surveys from activists who organized the nationally coordinated climate strikes in the US that began with Fridays for Future in spring 2019. Building on the research on alliance building and strategic coalitions, this article analyzes how the patterns of participation changed over the period of the study. We employ social network analysis to map the affiliation networks among the organizers of these events to assess the coalitions of groups involved and the shifting organizational landscape. Our analysis does not provide evidence that groups spanned the boundaries across movements, nor does it show that identity plays a role in coalition building in this movement. Instead, by mapping out the coalition of organizations within this movement and how connections among them change over time, we see clear evidence that this youth-led movement was reoriented by adult-led organizations. Our article concludes by considering how these findings suggest the future trajectory of the youth climate movement and its role in a ‘new climate politics’ in America.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference82 articles.

1. 350.org Team. (2019, September 28). 7.6 million people demand action after week of climate strikes. 350.org Team. Retrieved from https://350.org/7-million-people-demand-action-after-week-of-climate-strikes

2. 350.org Team. (2021, March 24). About 350. 350.org Team. Retrieved from https://350.org/about

3. Adam, E. M. (2017). Intersectional coalitions: The paradoxes of rights-based movement building in LGBTQ and immigrant communities. Law & Society Review, 51(1), 132–167.

4. Arrieta-Kenna, R. (2019, June 16). The Sunrise movement actually changed the democratic conversation: So what do you do for a sequel? Politico. Retrieved from https://politi.co/2WJnIa2

5. Barkan, S. E. (1979). Strategic, tactical and organizational dilemmas of the protest movement against nuclear power. Social Problems, 27(1), 19–37.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3