Abstract
Against the historical-conceptual background of EU social policy and evolutionary governance, this article analyses the approach with which the EU propagates social investment policies. Social investment, understood as an active rather than passive way of social protection, has become a salient instrument for reinvigorating the EU’s social dimension, especially in the aftermath of the sovereign debt crisis. By means of a large-scale document analysis, we develop four EU social investment propagation approaches (reference, objective, tool, and action) according to how active (passive) and concrete (abstract) the EU’s intervention in social investment is. The results show that the EU mainly propagates social investment with an active approach, i.e., policy recommendations targeted at national governments. In terms of substance, the EU’s treatment of social investment is based on labour activation policies backed by skills development and job search support policies, which is consistent with the main purpose of social investment.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference64 articles.
1. Alcidi, C., & Gros, D. (2017). How to strengthen the European Semester? (CEPS Research Report No. 2017/15). Centre for European Policy Studies.
2. Bekker, S. (2015). European socioeconomic governance in action: Coordinating social policies in the third European Semester (1) (OSE Research Paper No. 19). L’Observatoire Social Européen.
3. Bekker, S. (2018). Flexicurity in the European Semester: Still a relevant policy concept? Journal of European Public Policy, 25(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363272
4. Beunen, R., & Van Assche, K. (2013). Contested delineations: Planning, law and the governance of protected areas. Environment and Planning A, 45(6), 1285–1301.
5. Beunen, R., Van Assche, K., & Duineveld, M. (2016). Evolutionary governance theory. Springer.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献