Lobbying Transparency: The Limits of EU Monitory Democracy

Author:

Dinan William

Abstract

This article examines the origins and current operation of the EU’s lobbying transparency register and offers a critical review of the drivers and politics associated with lobbying reform in Brussels. The analysis considers the dynamics of political communication in EU institutions and draws on concepts of the fourth estate, the public sphere and monitory democracy to illustrate the particular challenges around lobbying transparency and opening up governance processes to wider scrutiny, and wider participation, at the EU level. This article draws upon interviews, official data and participant observation of some of the deliberations on lobbying transparency dating back to the 2005 ETI. The analysis is brought up to date by examining the data within the Transparency Register itself, both substantively in terms of the kinds of information disclosed and in relation to trends around disclosures and registration, since the register was launched over a decade ago. The article concludes with a critical appraisal of the evolving issue culture relating to lobbying transparency in Brussels as well as recommendations for the development of the Transparency Register itself.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference57 articles.

1. ALTER EU. (2009). The Commission’s lobby register one year on: Success or failure? Brussels: ALTER EU. Retrieved from https://www.alter-eu.org/sites/default/files/documents/register-assessment-after-one-year.pdf

2. ALTER EU. (2014). Mandatory lobby transparency register: Proposals from ALTER-EU. Brussels: ALTER EU. Retrieved from https://www.alter-eu.org/documents/2014/12

3. Baisnee, O. (2007). The European public sphere does not exist (at least it’s worth wondering…). European Journal of Communication, 22(4), 493–503.

4. Balanyá, B., Doherty, A., Hoedeman, O., Ma’anit, A., & Wesselius, E. (2003). Europe Inc.: Regional & global restructuring and the rise of corporate power. London: Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt18fs6t9

5. Berkhout, J., & Lowery, D. (2008). Counting organized interests in the European union: A comparison of data sources. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 489–513.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3