Abstract
The rise of populist movements across the globe has instigated considerable research interest into populism, predominantly in Western democracies. Non-democratic Russia, however, is not exempt from this populist trend, and distinguishable populist rhetoric can be observed both inside and outside the establishment. Alexey Navalny, who regularly organises mass protests in Russia, is considered to be an outsider of systemic politics. Despite several unsuccessful attempts to be elected, his popularity continues to grow, largely due to digital instruments such as YouTube. In light of limited press freedom, YouTube has become one of the most trustworthy platforms for Navalny to publish his investigative documentaries about Russian corruption. In his videos, Navalny adopts a populist communication style to oppose himself to Putin’s ‘corrupt’ elite. Different investigative journalism practices help Navalny to discredit the establishment, whereas his activist appeals may motivate his supporters to engage in political action. In this article, I explore how Navalny combines the practices of investigative journalism and civic activism in his populist communication on YouTube. Using the method of content analysis, I explore a case study of Navalny’s YouTube communication and reveal four types of populism which play a special role in his narration. These are ‘superficial,’ ‘investigative,’ ‘radical,’ and ‘advocacy’ populisms. Advocacy<em> </em>populism, for instance, provides evidence of corruption elite crimes through journalism practices and in calling people to political action. The most visible concentration of these parts of narration was observed in YouTube videos released by the activist before and during anti-corruption protests of 2017.
Reference56 articles.
1. Agora. (2018). Svoboda Interneta 2017: polzuchaya kriminalizatsiya [The freedom of the Internet 2017: Slithering criminalization]. Agora. Retrieved from https://www.agora.legal/articles/Doklad-Mezhdunarodnoi-Agory-«Svoboda-interneta-2017-polzuchaya-kriminalizaciya»/11
2. Agora. (2019). Doklad mezdunarodnoi Agory 2018
3. Svoboda interneta 2018: delegirovanie repressii [The report of International Agora: The freedom of the Internet and delegation of the repression]. Agora. Retrieved from https://agora.legal/articles/Doklad-Mezhdunarodnoi-Agory-«Svoboda-interneta-2018-delegirovanie-repressiy»/18
4. Appelgren, E., & Nygren, G. (2014). Data journalism in Sweden: Introducing new methods and genres of journalism into ‘old’ organizations. Digital Journalism, 2(3), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.884344
5. Becker, J. (2004). Lessons from Russia: A neo-authoritarian media system. European Journal of Communication, 19(2), 139–163.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献