‘Four Populisms’ of Alexey Navalny: An Analysis of Russian Non-Systemic Opposition Discourse on YouTube

Author:

Glazunova SofyaORCID

Abstract

The rise of populist movements across the globe has instigated considerable research interest into populism, predominantly in Western democracies. Non-democratic Russia, however, is not exempt from this populist trend, and distinguishable populist rhetoric can be observed both inside and outside the establishment. Alexey Navalny, who regularly organises mass protests in Russia, is considered to be an outsider of systemic politics. Despite several unsuccessful attempts to be elected, his popularity continues to grow, largely due to digital instruments such as YouTube. In light of limited press freedom, YouTube has become one of the most trustworthy platforms for Navalny to publish his investigative documentaries about Russian corruption. In his videos, Navalny adopts a populist communication style to oppose himself to Putin’s ‘corrupt’ elite. Different investigative journalism practices help Navalny to discredit the establishment, whereas his activist appeals may motivate his supporters to engage in political action. In this article, I explore how Navalny combines the practices of investigative journalism and civic activism in his populist communication on YouTube. Using the method of content analysis, I explore a case study of Navalny’s YouTube communication and reveal four types of populism which play a special role in his narration. These are ‘superficial,’ ‘investigative,’ ‘radical,’ and ‘advocacy’ populisms. Advocacy<em> </em>populism, for instance, provides evidence of corruption elite crimes through journalism practices and in calling people to political action. The most visible concentration of these parts of narration was observed in YouTube videos released by the activist before and during anti-corruption protests of 2017.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Communication

Reference56 articles.

1. Agora. (2018). Svoboda Interneta 2017: polzuchaya kriminalizatsiya [The freedom of the Internet 2017: Slithering criminalization]. Agora. Retrieved from https://www.agora.legal/articles/Doklad-Mezhdunarodnoi-Agory-«Svoboda-interneta-2017-polzuchaya-kriminalizaciya»/11

2. Agora. (2019). Doklad mezdunarodnoi Agory 2018

3. Svoboda interneta 2018: delegirovanie repressii [The report of International Agora: The freedom of the Internet and delegation of the repression]. Agora. Retrieved from https://agora.legal/articles/Doklad-Mezhdunarodnoi-Agory-«Svoboda-interneta-2018-delegirovanie-repressiy»/18

4. Appelgren, E., & Nygren, G. (2014). Data journalism in Sweden: Introducing new methods and genres of journalism into ‘old’ organizations. Digital Journalism, 2(3), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.884344

5. Becker, J. (2004). Lessons from Russia: A neo-authoritarian media system. European Journal of Communication, 19(2), 139–163.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Zjawisko autokracji informacyjnej: treść i cechy;Refleksje. Pismo naukowe studentów i doktorantów WNPiD UAM;2023-12-11

2. Digital democracy: A systematic literature review;Frontiers in Political Science;2023-02-09

3. Editorial: Populism in and Through Online Communities;Media and Communication;2022-11-29

4. How disinformation operations against Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny influence the international audience on Twitter;Social Network Analysis and Mining;2022-07-14

5. Navalny’s YouTube Communication During the Presidential Campaign 2016–2018;Digital Activism in Russia;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3