Dual Control: Investigating the Role of Drone (UAV) Operators in TV and Online Journalism

Author:

Adams Catherine

Abstract

At a time when TV and online journalism embraces more moving images filmed from drones than ever before, this article seeks to explore the thoughts and actions of those who produce them. It builds on earlier research into how aerial images impact on the viewer through the lens of ‘quality journalism’ (Adams, 2018). It investigates how drone operators are involved in the journalistic process, what meanings and effects they seek and who controls their work in a market-driven environment. Qualitative analysis was carried out of seventeen in-depth interviews with drone operators, journalists and editors working in UK and around the world. Data revealed a high degree of creative freedom among the operators, a passion for using drones and some desire to immerse and impress the viewer. It showed that aerial images have become paramount in video journalism amid market pressures to find ever more sophisticated and ‘cinematic’ shots. Interviewees felt drones had been “good for journalism,” by providing raw data, exciting new perspectives, context and story-telling techniques and “space to think.” The article explores the significant yet often unplanned contribution to the journalistic process of the drone operator and recommends more is done to increase understanding between journalist and pilot, such as providing training courses designed to teach quality drone journalism, as the media approaches ‘peak drone.’

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Communication

Reference52 articles.

1. Adams, C. (2018). Tinker, tailor, soldier, thief: An investigation into the role of drones in journalism. Digital Journalism, 7(5), 658–677.

2. Auslander, P. (1999). Liveness: Performance in a mediatized culture. London: Routledge.

3. Belair-Gagnon, V., Owen, T., & Holton, A. E. (2017). Unmanned aerial vehicles and journalistic disruption: Perspectives of early professional adopters. Digital Journalism, 5(10), 1226–1239.

4. Blöbaum, B. (2016). Trust and communication in a digitized world. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

5. Cardoso, R. (2015). Flesh and the beholder: Towards a phenomenology of digital viewing. In T. Kristensen (Ed.), The cultural dimension of visuality: Visual organisations. Liverpool: University Press.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3