Abstract
From self-driving cars to smart city sensors, billions of devices will be connected to networks in the next few years. These devices will collect vast amounts of data which needs to be processed in real-time, overwhelming centralized cloud architectures. To address this need, the industry seeks to process data closer to the source, driving a major shift from the cloud to the ‘edge.’ This article critically investigates the privacy implications of edge computing. It outlines the abilities introduced by the edge by drawing on two recently published scenarios, an automated license plate reader and an ethnic facial detection model. Based on these affordances, three key questions arise: what kind of data will be collected, how will this data be processed at the edge, and how will this data be ‘completed’ in the cloud? As a site of intermediation between user and cloud, the edge allows data to be extracted from individuals, acted on in real-time, and then abstracted or sterilized, removing identifying information before being stored in conventional data centers. The article thus argues that edge affordances establish a fundamental new ‘privacy condition’ while sidestepping the safeguards associated with the ‘privacy proper’ of personal data use. Responding effectively to these challenges will mean rethinking person-based approaches to privacy at both regulatory and citizen-led levels.
Reference66 articles.
1. Alrawais, A., Alhothaily, A., Hu, C., & Cheng, X. (2017). Fog computing for the Internet of Things: Security and privacy issues. IEEE Internet Computing, 21(2), 34–42.
2. Ananthanarayanan, G., Bahl, P., Bodík, P., Chintalapudi, K., Philipose, M., Ravindranath, L., & Sinha, S. (2017). Real-time video analytics: The killer app for edge computing. Computer, 50(10), 58–67.
3. Bailas, C., Marsden, M., Zhang, D., O’Connor, N. E., & Little, S. (2018). Performance of video processing at the edge for crowd-monitoring applications. In H. Mueller, Y. Rongshan, & A. Skarmeta (Eds.), 2018 IEEE 4th world forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) (pp. 482–487). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
4. Barocas, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (2014). Big data’s end run around procedural privacy protections. Communications of the ACM, 57(11), 31–33.
5. Barreneche, C., & Wilken, R. (2015). Platform specificity and the politics of location data extraction. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4/5), 497–513.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献