Abstract
In this article, we explain why the current climate policy mix of the European Union (EU), consisting of the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and overlapping policies, is incoherent with respect to emission abatement and cost-effectiveness. The concept of policy coherence guides our analysis in identifying the EU ETS’ current dynamic supply adjustment mechanism, the Market Stability Reserve (MSR), to be at the heart of the shortcomings of current market design. Incoherence emerges due to the MSR’s quantity-based indicator for scarcity. It only works well for current and past demand fluctuations, but not for anticipated changes in demand, e.g., caused by a member state’s fossil-fuel phase-out. As a result, instead of fostering synergies as intended, the MSR undermines coherence by creating backfiring interactions and making precise predictions of overlapping policies’ impacts close to impossible. Considering the European Commission’s reform proposal of July 2021, we argue that a change in the MSR’s parametrisation leaves the fundamental cause of incoherence unaddressed. Based on recent findings in the economics literature, we propose introducing a price-based indicator for scarcity as a solution to substantially reduce the current incoherence of the policy mix.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference61 articles.
1. Bayer, P., & Aklin, M. (2020). The European Union emissions trading system reduced CO2 emissions despite low prices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(16), 8804–8812. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918128117
2. Boasson, E. L., Leiren, M. D., & Wettestad, J. (2020). Introduction. In E. L. Boasson, M. D. Leiren, & J. Wettestad (Eds.), Comparative renewables policy: Political, organizational and European fields (pp. 3–18). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429198144
3. Böhringer, C., Rutherford, T. F., & Tol, R. S. (2009). The EU 20/20/2020 targets: An overview of the EMF22 assessment. Energy Economics, 31, S268–S273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.10.010
4. Bruninx, K., Ovaere, M., & Delarue, E. (2020). The long-term impact of the market stability reserve on the EU emission trading system. Energy Economics, 89, Article 104746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104746
5. Burtraw, D., Holt, C., Palmer, K., & Shobe, W. (2020). Quantities with prices: Price-responsive allowance supply in environmental markets (Working Paper 20-17). Resources for the Future. https://www.rff.org/publications/working-papers/quantities-prices-price-responsive-allowance-supply-environmental-markets
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献