Author:
Seibicke Helena,Michailidou Asimina
Abstract
This article reflects on the discursive representation, legal, and practical challenges of locating, classifying, and publishing citizens’ views of the EU in digital media discourse. We start with the discursive representation challenge of locating and identifying citizens’ voices in social and news media discourse. The second set of challenges pertains to the legal, regulatory framework guiding research ethics on personal data but also cuts across the academic debate on what constitutes “public” discourse in the digital public sphere. The third set of challenges are practical but of no less consequence. Here we bring in the issue of marketisation of the public sphere and of the digital commons, and how these processes affect the ethics but also the feasibility and reliability of digital public sphere analysis. Thereby we illustrate that barriers to content analysis can make data collection practically challenging, feeding dilemmas with data reliability and research ethics. These methodological and empirical challenges are illustrated and unpacked with examples from the Benchmark project, which analysed the extent to which citizens drive EU contestation on social and digital news media. Our study focuses on UK public discourse on a possible European Economic Area solution, and the reactions such discourse may have triggered in two EU-associated countries, Norway and Switzerland, in the post-Brexit referendum period 2016–2019. We thus take a broad European perspective of EU contestation that is not strictly confined within the EU public sphere(s). The case study illustrates the research process and the emerging empirical challenges and concludes with reflections and practical suggestions for future research projects.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference47 articles.
1. Asenbaum, H. (2019). Rethinking digital democracy: From the disembodied discursive delf to dew daterialist corporealities. Communication Theory, 31(3), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz033
2. Baisnée, O. (2007). The European public sphere does not exist (at least it’s worth wondering…). European Journal of Communication, 22(4), 493–503.
3. Baldwin, J., Brunsdon, T., Gaudoin, J., & Hirsch, L. (in press). Towards a social media research methodology. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/23420
4. Barisione, M., & Michailidou, A. (2017). Do we need to rethink EU politics in the social media era? In M. Barisione & A. Michailidou (Eds.), Social media and European politics: Rethinking power and legitimacy in the digital era (pp. 1–23). Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Beninger, K. (2017). Social media users’ view on the ethics of social media research. In A. Quan-Haase & L. Sloan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (pp. 53–73). SAGE.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献