Reforming the Reception and Inclusion of Refugees in the European Union: Utopian or Dystopian Changes?

Author:

La Spina Encarnación

Abstract

The provision of high‐quality reception conditions and the effective inclusion of refugees are permanent challenges in the implementation of the European asylum agenda. The EU legal framework for the reception of refugees has evolved over time through various legislative reforms, notably including those launched in 2016 and the New Pact on Migration and Asylum proposed in 2020. The European Union has also tried to reinforce its non‐binding integration policy with the adoption of the Action Plan on Integration and Inclusion 2021–2027. While this plan is intended to promote an alternative “social resilient” integration model for refugees that emulates community sponsorship in Europe, it also generates great bottom‐up expectations to provide better integration. These legislative reform proposals and their programmatic framework are theoretically intended to consolidate the European reception and integration system, but in practice have increased the dichotomous tension between utopia and dystopia. Drawing on a political interpretation of both concepts, this article critically analyses the real nature of the changes proposed in the legislative CEAS reforms and in the action plans. Both visions are useful to evaluate the desirability, viability, and achievability of these transformative changes in the future asylum system.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference67 articles.

1. Acosta, D. (2012). “En attendant Godot” or the EU law limits to integration conditions. In Y. Pascouau & T. Strik (Eds.), Which integration policies for migrants? Interaction between the EU and its member states (pp. 153–170). Wolf Legal Publishers.

2. Abubacarr Jawo v. Germany, C-163/17, ECLI:EU:C: 2019:218 (2017).

3. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.

4. Babicka, K. (2020, June 29). The covid-19 measures impact of the rights of migrants and refugees in the EU. OpinioJuris. http://opiniojuris.org/2020/06/29/the-covid-19-measures-impact-on-the-rights-of-migrants-and-refugees-in-the-eu-access-to-the-right-to-seek-asylum-and-reception-and-living-conditions

5. Bauböck, R. (2019). Mare nostrum: The political ethics of migration in the Mediterranean. Comparative Migration Studies, 7(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0116-8

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3