Abstract
Using annual household surveys from 2004 to 2019, we examine the existence of a gender labor income gap among older persons in Peru. Two labor income models are estimated: Model 1 uses a basic set of demographic, socioeconomic, and personal characteristics as regressors (also called endowments); Model 2 uses the basic set plus additional personal characteristics. The Misner‐type relationship holds with positive returns for education and experience, and the anticipated association to the endowments. The Oaxaca‐Blinder decomposition yields an explained labor income gender gap of 44.4% (Model 1) and 51.5% (Model 2), i.e., controlling for endowments, approximately one half of the labor income difference remains unexplained and can be attributed to discrimination and labor segregation. In light of these results, we estimate Model 3 with two additional variables (head of household and beneficiary of intergenerational private transfer) which attempt to capture gendered stereotypes. With these two variables which provide information on gender discrimination the explained labor income gap for Model 3 is 71.1%—an increase of 19.6%. The unexplained component of the difference in labor income amounts to 28.8% that we attribute to unobserved variables that operate as post‐labor market elements in patriarchal societies. Results show that gender inequity during a woman’s life‐span manifests acutely among older women, which raises important implications for policy interventions.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology
Reference52 articles.
1. Alarco, G., Castillo, C., & Leiva, F. (2019). Riqueza y desigualdad en el Perú: Una visión panorámica [Wealth and inequality in Peru: A panoramic vision]. Oxfam. https://cng-cdn.oxfam.org/peru.oxfam.org/s3fs-public/file_attachments/Riqueza-y-desigualdad-en-el-Peru-vision-panoramica.pdf
2. Altamirano, A., Berstein, S., Bosch, M., Caballero, G., García-Huitrón, M., Keller, L., & Silva-Porto, M. T. (2019). Diagnóstico del sistema de pensiones peruano y avenidas de reforma [Analysis of the Peruvian pension system and reform proposals]. InterAmerican Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/Diagn%C3%B3stico_del_sistema_de_pensiones_peruano_y_avenidas_de_reforma_es.pdf
3. Amarante, V., Colacce, M., & Manzi, P. (2016). La brecha de género en jubilaciones y pensiones. Los casos de Argentina, Brasil, Chile y Uruguay [The gender gap in contributory and social pensions. The cases of Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay]. United Nations; ECLAC; Cooperación Española. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/40650?locale-attribute=en
4. Amarante, V., Colacce, M., & Tenenbaum, V. (2019). The national care system in Uruguay: Who benefits and who pays? Population and Development Review, 45, 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12271
5. Ariza, J., & Montes-Rojas, G. (2019). Decomposition methods for analyzing inequality changes in Latin America 2002–2014. Empirical Economics, 57(6), 2043–2078. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1518-4
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献