Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between childcare usage and parents’ intentions to have a second child in Belarus. Previous research has established that low fertility in Belarus can be primarily explained by falling second birth rates. However, a substantial research gap remains regarding the determinants of the low rate of second childbearing in Belarus. Based on a comprehensive review of hypothesised fertility barriers and family policy options in Belarus, this study leverages data from the Belarusian Generations and Gender Survey (GGS) from 2017 to examine the relationship between formal, informal, and mixed childcare usage and parents’ intention to have a second child. The analysis is based on fertile individuals aged 18–45 who have a partner and one biological child under 11 years old (i.e., up to the age at which children leave primary school). The model controls for sex, age, education, respondents’ economic wellbeing, the employment status of both partners, and the age of their child. Applying logistic regression, the analysis demonstrates that mixed childcare support increases respondents’ intentions to have an additional child. Having a child aged 3–6 years, being below 26 years old and male, are also associated with a higher likelihood of intentions to have a second child. No association was found between economic wellbeing or employment status and second‐parity fertility intentions. The results of this study suggest that gender‐egalitarian family policy instruments that improve institutional childcare and that incentivise men to participate in childcare could reduce barriers to second childbearing in Belarus.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology
Reference56 articles.
1. Allison, C., & Ringold, D. (1996). Labor markets in transition in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989–1995 (World Bank Technical Paper No. 352). World Bank.
2. Amialchuk, A., Lisenkova, K., Salnykov, M., & Yemelyanau, M. (2014). Economic determinants of fertility in Belarus: A micro-data analysis. Economics of Transition, 22(3), 577–604.
3. Artemenko, E. (2016). Faktori reproduktivnogo vibora belorusov [Reproductive choice factors for Belarusians] (Working Paper No. 2). Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies.
4. Axinn, W. G., & Barber, J. S. (2001). Mass education and fertility transition. American Sociological Review, 66(4), 481–505.
5. Balbo, N., & Mills, M. (2011). The influence of the family network on the realisation of fertility intentions. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 179–205.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献