The Never‐Ending Road Towards the CEAS: Utopia, Teleology, and Depoliticisation in EU Asylum Policies

Author:

Vianelli LorenzoORCID

Abstract

This article explores the temporal dimension of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) by exposing its teleological character and the effects of the latter on the governance of asylum in the European Union. Drawing on EU policy documents, the article shows how the CEAS has been presented since its inception as a teleology, that is, a process that is inexorably unfolding towards a specific outcome to be reached in an indefinite time in the future. The outcome consists in the establishment of a common area of protection constituted by a level playing field in which asylum seekers and beneficiaries of international protection will be treated alike regardless of the place of residence. Such a teleological narrative informing the CEAS paves the way to overly optimistic expectations on the possibilities of implementation, which in turn result in an overestimation of the potential of harmonisation. By discussing the limitations of harmonisation in relation to the reception of asylum seekers, this article calls into question the possibility of a homogeneous area of protection where equivalent conditions are offered to all asylum seekers across the EU. Such a homogeneous space is utopian because harmonisation does not aim to eradicate differences but rather to mitigate them, thus tolerating diverse arrangements. The article, therefore, argues that the level playing field projected by the CEAS constitutes a promise that has two key effects: First, it depoliticises the CEAS itself by framing problems as technical issues, requiring technical solutions; second, it paves the way to further EU intervention in this field.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference54 articles.

1. Abram, S., & Weszkalnys, G. (2011). Introduction: Anthropologies of planning—Temporality, imagination, and ethnography. Focaal—Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 61, 3–18.

2. AIDA. (2018). Access to protection in Europe: The registration of asylum applications. https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/aida_accessii_registration.pdf

3. AIDA. (2019). Housing out of reach? The reception of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe. https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/aida_housing_out_of_reach.pdf

4. Barry, A. (1993). The European community and European government: Harmonization, mobility and space. Economy and Society, 22(3), 314–326.

5. Barry, A. (1994). Harmonization and the art of European government. In C. Rootes & H. Devis (Eds.), Social change and political transformation (pp. 39–54). UCL Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3