Social Support for Digital Inclusion: Towards a Typology of Social Support Patterns

Author:

Asmar AxelleORCID,Van Audenhove Leo,Mariën Ilse

Abstract

This article contributes to a better understanding of patterns of social support in relation to digital inequalities. Based on an extensive qualitative study, the diversity of support networks and supports seeking patterns are unveiled. A typology of six patterns of help-seeking is presented and described: the support-deprived, the community-supported, the supported through substitution, the network-supported, the vicarious learners, and the self-supported. The article also critically engages with the often unnuanced academic literature on social support. The research and the typology reveal that the quality of support, as well as the availability of potential or actual support, is not only influenced by socio-economic factors. Rather, the strength of the relationship and the level of intimacy between individuals is an important predictor of support-seeking. As such, this article shows that mechanisms of in/exclusion are highly social, as they entail a diversity of formal and informal support-seeking patterns, which in turn have an important influence on the adoption and use of digital media. The article argues that understanding such mechanisms is rooted in reconciling micro-level interactions to macro-level patterns of inequalities. To show the specificity of social support within digital inequalities research, and to demarcate the concept from definitions of other academic disciplines, the concept of social support for digital inclusion is introduced. It is defined as the aid (emotional, instrumental, and informational) that an individual receives from his/her network in his/her use of digital technologies.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference39 articles.

1. Asmar, A., van Audenhove, L., & Mariën, I. (in press). Setting the future scene of inclusion: A qualitative analysis beyond the life course (Research Report D.2.2). Brussels: Belspo.

2. Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet society: The Internet in the everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

3. Brown, J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word of mouth rereferral behaviour. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350–361.

4. Buente, W., & Robbin, A. (2008). Trends in internet information behavior 2000–2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1743–1760.

5. Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). Digicomp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use (Report No. JRC106281). Seville: Joint Research Center.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3