Abstract
Conviviality can briefly be defined as togetherness among strangers despite their differences. While most of the research on conviviality focuses on (inter-)cultural differences, this article argues that considering other kinds of differences (e.g., socio-economic status, gender, age, stage of the life course, etc.) may increase our understanding of conviviality. In addition, to help us measure the convivial use of public space, the article looks at participation in “optional activities” (e.g., enjoying the sun, playing), which contribute to a convivial atmosphere by encouraging people to be co-present, thus offering the potential for “thicker sociability.” Based on fieldwork consisting of behavioural mapping (<em>n</em> = 1,448) and an intercept survey (<em>n</em> = 1,474), this study explores key factors that increase the likelihood of people using three small public squares in Zurich, Switzerland, in a convivial way. A logistic regression model based on survey data shows that, even when controlling for individual factors, the squares and their affordances contribute substantially to convivial use, e.g., by providing ample seating. The model furthermore suggests that gender, people’s relationship to the neighbourhood, their occupation, and the time of day, are more significant factors in shaping convivial use of the squares than the cultural background, socio-economic status, age, or having children.
Reference47 articles.
1. Aelbrecht, P., Stevens, Q., & Nisha, B. (2019). Introduction: From mixing with strangers to collective placemaking: Existing theories, policies and practices around social cohesion in public space design. In P. Aelbrecht & Q. Stevens (Eds.), Public space design and social cohesion an international comparison (pp. 1–33). Routledge.
2. Baran, P. K., Smith, W. R., Moore, R. C., Floyd, M. F., Bocarro, J. N., Cosco, N. G., & Danninger, T. M. (2014). Park use among youth and adults: Examination of individual, social, and urban form factors. Environment and Behavior, 46(6), 768–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512470134
3. Bassand, M., Compagnon, A., Joye, D., & Stein, V. (2001). Vivre et créer l’espace public [Living and creating public space]. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.
4. Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S., & Smith, G. (1985). Responsive environments: A manual for designers. Architectural Press.
5. Bergefurt, L., Kemperman, A., van den Berg, P., Borgers, A., van der Waerden, P., Oosterhuis, G., & Hommel, M. (2019). Loneliness and life satisfaction explained by public-space use and mobility patterns. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(21), Article 4282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214282
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献