Abstract
While there is a considerable body of literature on symbolic boundaries that engages with long-established/newcomer configurations, work on conviviality has only rarely taken this angle, despite its general focus on contexts of immigration-related diversity. This article connects these works of literature by examining insider-outsider configurations between long-established residents and newcomers in two very different contexts of rapid demographic change, where the established population is already marginalized and feels further threatened by newcomers. Drawing on ethnographic research in Newham, UK, and Mshongo, South Africa, we advance debates on conviviality by revealing how perceptions of inequality, lack of civility, and lack of reciprocity shape symbolic boundaries against newcomers, which may, in turn, be softened by convivial practices. We also consider what the differences between the sites might reveal about the enabling conditions for conviviality in such neighbourhoods.
Reference52 articles.
1. Aldridge, H., Born, T. B., Tinson, A., & MacInnes, T. (2015). London’s poverty profile: Newham. New Policy Institute. https://npi.org.uk/files/5714/4533/2889/LPP_2015_report.pdf
2. Ali, N., & Whitham, B. (2021). Racial capitalism, islamophobia, and austerity. International Political Sociology, 15, 190–211.
3. Aston-Mansfield Community Involvement Unit. (2017). Newham key statistics 2017. https://www.aston-mansfield.org.uk/wp-content/themes/aston_mansfield/uploads/Newham_Statistics_2017.pdf
4. Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Waveland Press.
5. Betts, A. (2013). Survival migration: Failed governance and the crisis of displacement. Cornell University Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献