Self-Management of Housing and Urban Commons: New Belgrade and Reflections on Commons Today

Author:

Dragutinovic AnicaORCID,Pottgiesser UtaORCID,Quist Wido

Abstract

The concepts of collective management of housing and urban spaces are being revisited within the contemporary discussions about community-driven approaches and practices and, in particular, related to the revitalization of residential neighbourhoods. This research identifies the concepts of self-management and social ownership of housing in the post-World War II period in Yugoslavia as an important legacy of Yugoslav urban planning and housing policies. Although they were subsequently neglected, these concepts can contribute to contemporary global discussions about housing affordability and the role of community in ensuring spatial and social equality. New Belgrade mass housing blocks—the main site for testing the new dwelling concepts, in terms of both policies and modernist design—are the object of this research. The article is mainly a theoretical analysis of the issues of common interest and engagement, common good, and common spaces which played a decisive role in its design. The study applies interpretative and correlational research methods in re-theorizing these concepts and their underlying narratives. It traces how the perspectives on the collective practices and spaces evolved over time, revealing a correlation between changed social practices and the spatial deterioration of the New Belgrade mass housing blocks. The study highlights the importance of both collective practices and common spaces for addressing housing issues, emphasizing their instrumentality, and potentiality for rearticulating the dialogue between public and private, engaging citizens in interactive and inclusive decision-making and co-creation of the urban reality.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Urban Studies

Reference38 articles.

1. Blagojevic, L. (2007). Novi Beograd: Osporeni modernizam [New Belgrade: Contested modernism]. Zavod za Udžbenike i Nastavna Sredstva.

2. Blagojevic, L. (2014). Novi Beograd: Reinventing utopia. In L. Stanek, C. Schmid, & A. Moravanszky (Eds.), Urban revolution now: Henri Lefebvre in social research and architecture (pp. 301–318). Ashgate Publishing.

3. Crestani, A. M. Z., & Pontes, B. B. (2018). The public space (in)visible to the eyes of Jane Jacobs. In R. Rocco (Ed.), Jane Jacobs is still here. Proceedings of the conference Jane Jacobs 100: Her legacy and relevance in the 21st century (pp. 48–54). TU Delft.

4. Cupers, K. (2020). Human territoriality and the downfall of public housing. Public Culture, 29(1), 165–190.

5. Dragutinovic, A., & Pottgiesser, U. (2021). Reuse of common space as a tactic for mass housing revitalization. In A. Tostoes & Y. Yamana (Eds.), The 16th international docomomo conference Tokyo Japan 2020+1, inheritable resilience: Sharing values of global modernities (pp. 340–345). Docomomo International; Docomomo Japan.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3