Abstract
This commentary reflects on the articles in the thematic issue on queering urban planning and municipal governance and the ways that they suggest that planning practice must be re-oriented to be more inclusive and incorporate more insurgent perspectives. Planning practice is susceptible to capture by neo-liberal corporate interests that marginalize vulnerable queer populations. More insurgent planning approaches are needed to resist the corporate take-over of queer spaces by empowering the voices of LGBTQ+ people.
Reference19 articles.
1. Arun-Pina, C. (2023). Homonegative labyrinth of representational distortions: Planning im/possibilities for higher education LGBTQ+ students in Mumbai. Urban Planning, 8(2), 150-163.
2. Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), 331–338.
3. Delgado, G., Castán Broto, V., & Mukesi, T. (2023). Queering housing policy: Questioning urban planning assumptions in Namibian cities. Urban Planning, 8(2), 164-176.
4. Doan, P. L. (2007). Queers in the American city: Transgendered perceptions of urban space. Gender, Place and Culture, 14(1), 57–74.
5. Doan, P. L. (Ed.). (2011). Queerying planning: Challenging heteronormative assumptions and reframing planning practice. Ashgate.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献