Instaworthy? Examining the Effects of (Targeted) Civic Education Ads on Instagram
-
Published:2023-06-29
Issue:3
Volume:11
Page:
-
ISSN:2183-2439
-
Container-title:Media and Communication
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:MaC
Author:
Errenst Emilia, Remoortere Annelien VanORCID, Vermeer SusanORCID, Kruikemeier SanneORCID
Abstract
The last few years have witnessed a growing societal and scholarly interest in the potential of online political microtargeting to affect election outcomes in favor of parties and candidates. It has often been rightly pointed out that political microtargeting can pose risks to electoral integrity in democracies. But can political microtargeting also benefit democratic functioning? Very little is known about the potential of political microtargeting to affect citizens’ attitudes towards politics and increase their civic participation. To address this paucity, this article presents a preregistered online experiment conducted in Germany among young adults (<em>N</em> = 445), examining whether (targeted) civic education ads on Instagram increase political interest, efficacy, and civic participation. An innovative methodological approach to studying political microtargeting is deployed, exposing respondents to civic education ads in a mock Instagram feed, personalized in real-time based on individual preferences. We find no direct evidence of (targeted) civic education ads, leading us to believe that (targeted) ads do not unconditionally affect political interest, efficacy, or civic participation.
Reference57 articles.
1. Achour, S., & Wagner, S. (2019). „Wer hat, dem wird gegeben.” Politische Bildung an Schulen—Bestandsaufnahme, Rückschlüsse und Handlungsempfehlungen [“Whoever has, will be given.“ Political education in schools - inventory, conclusions and recommendations for action]. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. https://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/polwiss/forschung/sozialkunde/politikdidaktik/Aktuelles/FES-Studie-Politische-Bildung-an-Schulen.pdf 2. Aggarwal, M., Allen, J., Coppock, A., Frankowski, D., Messing, S., Zhang, K., Barnes, J., Beasley, A., Hantman, H., & Zheng, S. (2023). A 2 million-person, campaign-wide field experiment shows how digital advertising affects voter turnout. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01487-4 3. Andersen, K., Ohme, J., Bjarnøe, C., Bordacconi, M. J., Albæk, E., & de Vreese, C. (2021). Generational gaps in political media use and civic engagement: From baby boomers to Generation Z (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003111498 4. Andersen, U., Bogumil, J., Marschall, S., & Woyke, W. (Eds.). (2021). Handwörterbuch des politischen Systems der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Dictionary of the political system in Germany]. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23666-3 5. Baldwin-Philippi, J. (2017). The myths of data-driven campaigning. Political Communication, 34(4), 627–633.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|