Abstract
This study positions social justice activists’ objections to dominant reporting norms as a catalyst for critically reassessing these norms and their connection to diminishing trust in US journalism. Based on a conceptual application of discourse ethics to journalism and qualitative analysis of 28 in-depth interviews with social justice activists, we examine how participants experience and evaluate mainstream coverage of social justice, and why they think journalism could improve its trustworthiness through practices consistent with solidarity<em> </em>reporting norms.
Reference68 articles.
1. Aitamurto, T. (2019). Normative paradoxes in 360° journalism: Contested accuracy and objectivity. New Media & Society, 21(1), 3–19.
2. Alamo-Pastrana, C., & Hoynes, W. (2020). Racialization of news: Constructing and challenging professional journalism as “white media.” Humanity & Society, 44(1), 67–91.
3. Almeida, E., & Robinson, S. (2023). Activists and journalists as co-creators and co-revisionists of IS histories: The 1619 New York Times project. International Journal of Communication, 17, 499–517.
4. Bauder, D. (2021, October 14). Efforts to track diversity in journalism are lagging. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/business-race-and-ethnicity-journalism-arts-and-entertainment-885ce3486382d7c3080519c50407aa18
5. Bennett, W. L. (2016). News: The politics of illusion (10th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献