Abstract
The myriad of information sources available online can make it hard for the average reader to know whether a piece of content is credible or not. This research aims to understand if the public’s assessment of the credibility of information could be more accurate with the help of transparency features that act as heuristic cues under the elaboration likelihood model and the heuristic-systematic model, and if the cues increase cognitive absorption. Two between-subjects studies were performed, one with a young demographic (<em>N</em> = 68) and another with a representative sample of the adult population (<em>N</em> = 325). The stimuli contained information boxes designed to indicate that the story was not written in a traditional journalistic style (message cues) and missing background information on the author (source cues). Results show significant effects of the cues on credibility assessment and cognitive absorption.
Reference41 articles.
1. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
2. Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., & Benjamins, R. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115.
3. Bhuiyan, M. M., Whitley, H., Horning, M., Lee, S. W., & Mitra, T. (2021). Designing transparency cues in online news platforms to promote trust: Journalists’ & consumers’ perspectives. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), Article 395. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479539
4. Brenan, M. (2022, October 18). Americans’ trust in media remains near record low. Gallup News. https://news.gallup.com/poll/403166/americans-trust-media-remains-near-record-low.aspx
5. Chadha, K., & Koliska, M. (2015). Newsrooms and transparency in the digital age. Journalism Practice, 9(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.924737