Abstract
In direct democracies, voters are faced with considerable information demands. Although search engines are an important gateway to political information, it is still unclear what role they play in citizens’ information behavior regarding referendum campaigns. Moreover, few studies have examined the search terms that citizens use when searching for political information and the potential “user-input biases” in this regard. Therefore, we investigate to what extent citizens search online for information about upcoming referendums and what differences emerge between proponents, opponents, and non-voters regarding the search terms they used and the results they visited, related to three national ballot proposals voted on in Switzerland on November 28, 2021. The study combines cross-sectional survey data with longitudinal digital trace data containing participants’ Google Search histories obtained through data donations. Our findings show that participants rarely used Google to search for information about upcoming referendums. Moreover, most ballot-related searches employed rather neutral search terms. Nevertheless, a qualitative analysis of the search terms points to differences between different voting groups, particularly for the most prominent proposal around a Covid-19 law. The study provides interesting insight into how citizens search for information online during national referendum campaigns.
Reference50 articles.
1. Ausloos, J., & Veale, M. (2021). Researching with data rights. Technology and Regulation, 2020, 136–157. https://doi.org/10.26116/techreg.2020.010
2. Baxter, G., & Marcella, R. (2017). Voters’ online information behaviour and response to campaign content during the Scottish referendum on independence. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.013
3. Bentley, F., Quehl, K., Wirfs-Brock, J., & Bica, M. (2019). Understanding online news behaviors. In S. Brewster & G. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paper No. 590). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300820
4. Bonfadelli, H., & Friemel, T. N. (2011). Learning and knowledge in political campaigns. In H. Kriesi (Ed.), Political communication in direct democratic campaigns (pp. 168–187). Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs—Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (Vol. 2, pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献