Abstract
This thematic issue examines questions of decision-making under limited (and contradictory) information, focusing on migration decisions. Migrants are far from a homogenous population, but they commonly use narratives as heuristics. We observe much agency among migrants to pursue migration plans, with migration decisions best understood as chains of multiple decisions rather than simple push-pull or two-step models.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology
Reference21 articles.
1. Alpes, M. J. (2012). Bushfalling at all cost: The economy of migratory knowledge in Anglophone Cameroon. African Diaspora, 5(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1163/187254612X646189
2. Auer, D., Römer, F., & Tjaden, J. (2020). Corruption and the desire to leave quasi-experimental evidence on corruption as a driver of emigration intentions. IZA Journal of Development and Migration, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/izajodm-2020-0007
3. Baláž, V., Williams, A. M., & Fifeková, E. (2016). Migration decision making as complex choice: Eliciting decision weights under conditions of imperfect and complex information through experimental methods. Population, Space and Place, 22(1), 36–53.
4. Batista, C., & McKenzie, D. (2020). Testing classic theories of migration in the lab. Paper presented at the Annual Migration Meeting, UCD Geary Institute for Public Policy, Ireland. Retrieved from https://research.unl.pt/ws/portalfiles/portal/26626231/batista_c2249.pdf
5. Belloni, M. (2016). Refugees as gamblers: Eritreans seeking to migrate through Italy. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 14(1), 104–119.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献