The Continuous Reproduction of Contradictions in the Urban Development of New Belgrade’s Central Area

Author:

Kucina IvanORCID

Abstract

The initial source for the continuous reproduction of contradictions in the central area of New Belgrade’s urban development was the mismatch between the dynamics of political and economic reforms and the static urban planning system that has been banded to the most progressive but rigid functionalist ideals that could not adapt to the emergent pace of these reforms. Consequently, during the socialist and post-socialist periods, the central area of New Belgrade grew irregularly by developing contradictory fragments rather than totality. The inconsistency of the socialist authorities in completing the capital city according to the urban plan despite political imperatives has continued with the post-socialist governing tendencies towards irregularity, privatization, and commercialization of urban development. A series of individual, short-term, and profitable urban projects that have opposed the socialist urban structure, have reused inherited socialist urban infrastructure as a fertile ground for their growth. More than presenting a new insight into the history of urban development of the central area of New Belgrade, this study uses it as the prime case to disclose the unsustainability of the urban planning system during the socialist past and post-socialist present. An alternative urban planning system would embrace the challenges of the continuous reproduction of contradiction by affirming an institutional network of platforms for collaboration among citizens, urban planners, authorities, and developers.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Reference23 articles.

1. Blagojevic, L. (2007). Novi Beograd: Osporeni modernizam. Zavod za Udzbenike i Nastavna Sredstva.

2. Bobic, N. (2014). New Belgrade after 1999: Spatial violence as de-socialisation, de-romanisation, and de-historisation. Architectural Theory Review, 19(3), 355–375.

3. Dragutinovic, A., & Nikezic, A. (2020). Unforeseen impulses of modernism: The case of New Belgrade blocks. In U. Pottgiesser, F. Jaschke, & M. Melenhorst (Eds.), 100 years Bauhaus: What interest do we take in modern movement today? (pp. 2–45). Docomomo Deutschland e.V.; OWL University of Applied Sciences.

4. Dragutinovic, A., & Pottgiesser, U. (2021). Reuse of common space as a tactic for mass housing revitalization. In A. Tostoes & Y. Yamana (Eds.), The 16th International Docomomo Conference Tokyo Japan 2020+1—Inheritable resilience: Sharing values of global modernities (pp. 340–345). Docomomo International; Docomomo Japan.

5. Glavicki, M. (1983). Novi Beograd kao predmet istraživanja. Izgradnja.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3