Author:
Dashtestaninejad Hossein,Van de Coevering Paul,De Kruijf Joost
Abstract
Car use in the sprawled urban region of Noord-Brabant is above the Dutch average. Does this reflect car dependency due to the lack of competitive alternative modes? Or are there other factors at play, such as differences in preferences? This article aims to determine the nature of car use in the region and explore to what extent this reflects car dependency. The data, comprising 3,244 respondents was derived from two online questionnaires among employees from the High-Tech Campus (2018) and the TU/e-campus (2019) in Eindhoven. Travel times to work by car, public transport, cycling, and walking were calculated based on the respondents’ residential location. Indicators for car dependency were developed using thresholds for maximum commuting times by bicycle and maximum travel time ratios between public transport and car. Based on these thresholds, approximately 40% of the respondents were categorised as car-dependent. Of the non-car-dependent respondents, 31% use the car for commuting. A binomial logit model revealed that higher residential densities and closer proximity to a railway station reduce the odds of car commuting. Travel time ratios also have a significant influence on the expected directions. Mode choice preferences (e.g., comfort, flexibility, etc.) also have a significant, and strong, impact. These results highlight the importance of combining hard (e.g., improvements in infrastructure or public transport provision) and soft (information and persuasion) measures to reduce car use and car dependency in commuting trips.
Reference38 articles.
1. Alshammari, T. O., Hassan, A. M., Arab, Y., Hussein, H., Khozaei, F., Saeed, M., Ahmed, B., Zghaibeh, M., Beitelmal, W., & Lee, H. (2022). The compactness of non-compacted urban developments: A critical review on sustainable approaches to automobility and urban sprawl. Sustainability, 14(18), Article 11121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811121
2. Anable, J. (2005). “Complacent car addicts” or “aspiring environmentalists”? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transport Policy, 12(1), 65–78.
3. Barr, S., Lampkin, S., Dawkins, L., & Williamson, D. (2022). “I feel the weather and you just know.” Narrating the dynamics of commuter mobility choices. Journal of Transport Geography, 103, Article 103407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103407
4. Bastiaanssen, J., & Breedijk, M. (2022). Toegang voor iedereen? Een analyse van de (on)bereikbaarheid van voorzieningen en banen in Nederland [Access for everyone? An analysis of the (in)accessibility of facilities and jobs in the Netherlands]. PBL.
5. Beige, S., & Axhausen, K. W. (2008). Long-term and mid-term mobility decisions during the life course: Experiences with a retrospective survey. IATSS Research, 32(2), 16–33.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Car Dependency and Urban Form;Urban Planning;2023-07-25