Collective Agency in the Making: How Social Innovations in the Food System Practice Democracy beyond Consumption

Author:

Fernandez-Wulff Paula

Abstract

As the deleterious impacts of conventional food systems on areas including public health, environmental sustainability, and farmers’ livelihoods are progressively unveiled, citizen-led initiatives have ubiquitously sprouted, collectively building what is now known as the alternative food system. Despite recent academic interest in the role of alternative food initiatives in countering a narrow view of democracy based on market-based purchasing power, little attention has been paid to a specific democratizing feature that allows for collective expression beyond consumption, that of collective agency. This article argues that it is precisely by focusing on collective agency as the driving force for food systems’ change that we can recognize the diverse contributions of social innovations to the democratization of food systems. By engaging with the reasonings of consumer sovereignty proponents, building on academic literature on the concept of collective agency, and drawing from empirical work with over a hundred local social innovations of the global North, this article proposes an agency typology that allows for parsing out its different dimensions, highlighting social innovations’ key role as agency enablers and agents of change in the democratization of food systems.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference80 articles.

1. Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109-137.

2. Alkire, S. (2005). Subjective quantitative studies of human agency. Social Indicators Research, 74, 217-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6525-0

3. Alkon, A., & Guthman, J. (Eds.). (2017). The new food activism: Opposition, cooperation, and collective action. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

4. Archer, M. S. (1988). Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Averitt, N. W., & Lande, R. H. (1997). Consumer sovereignty: A unified theory of antitrust and consumer protection law. Antitrust Law Journal, 65, 713-756.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3