Abstract
This article analyses salient trade-offs in the design of democracy. It grounds this analysis in a distinction between two basic models of democracy: simple and complex majoritarianism. These models differ not only in their electoral and party systems, but also in the style of coalition-building. Simple majoritarianism concentrates executive power in a single majority party; complex majoritarianism envisions the formation of shifting, issue-specific coalitions among multiple parties whose programs differ across multiple conflict dimensions. The latter pattern of coalition formation is very difficult to create and sustain under pure parliamentary government. A separation of powers between executive and legislature can facilitate such a pattern, while also achieving central goals of simple majoritarianism: identifiable cabinet alternatives before the election and stable cabinets afterward. The separation of powers can thus balance simple and complex majoritarianism in ways that are unavailable under parliamentarism. The article also compares the presidential and semi-parliamentary versions of the separation of powers. It argues that the latter has important advantages, e.g., when it comes to resolving inter-branch deadlock, as it avoids the concentration of executive power in a single human being.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference55 articles.
1. Åberg, J., & Sedelius, T. (2018). A structured review of semi-presidential studies: Debates, results and missing pieces. British Journal of Political Science, 2018, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000017
2. Angelova, M., Bäck, H., Müller, W. C., & Strobl, D. (2018). Veto player theory and reform making in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 282-307.
3. Bergman, T. (1993). Formation rules and minority governments. European Journal of Political Research, 23(1), 55-66.
4. Best, R. E., & Zhirnov, A. (2015). The perils and pitfalls of ignoring disproportionality’s behavioral components. Electoral Studies, 40, 256-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.09.010
5. Bulmer, E. (2017). Dissolution of parliament: International IDEA constitution-building primer 16 (2nd ed.). Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献