Empowering People—Democratising the Food System? Exploring the Democratic Potential of Food-Related Empowerment Forms

Author:

Bornemann Basil,Weiland SabineORCID

Abstract

The current food system, characterised by considerable concentrations of economic and political power, is widely regarded as undemocratic and in many respects unsustainable in its outcomes. To address the democratic deficits in the food system, empowerment has become a central claim and point of reference for actors seeking to transform the system. In fact, numerous venues and practices have emerged in recent years to develop people’s capacities to engage with food issues. These range from local food initiatives and health-food movements to food policy councils and government education policies. This article takes a closer look at the theory and practice of democratic empowerment in the food system. It explores whether and how different forms of food-related empowerment have the potential to improve the democratic quality of the food system. Based on a broad analytical understanding of empowerment that is combined with a notion of power-based complex democracy, it is argued that different forms of food-related empowerment promote the development of different types of power, which in turn are constitutive for different functions of the democratic process. From this perspective, the challenge of democratising the food system lies in linking different complementary empowerment practices into functioning configurations of complex democratic governance.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference65 articles.

1. Alkon, A. H., & Guthman, J. (Eds.). (2017). The new food activism: Opposition, cooperation, and collective action. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

2. Allen, A. (1998). Rethinking power. Hypatia, 13(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01350

3. Allen, A. (2008). Power and the politics of difference: Oppression, empowerment, and transnational justice. Hypatia, 23(3), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01210.x

4. Andersen, J., & Siim, B. (2004). Introduction: The politics of inclusion and empowerment—Gender, class and citizenship. In J. Andersen & B. Siim (Eds.), Politics of inclusion and empowerment: Gender, class and citizenship (pp. 1–18). Houndmills, Basingstoke and Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

5. Avelino, F. (2017). Power in sustainability transitions: Analysing power and (dis)empowerment in transformative change towards sustainability. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(6), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1777

Cited by 44 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3