Abstract
The re-establishment of border controls in the Schengen Area since 2015 and repeated contestation of the Common European Asylum System have made the policy sector of migration and asylum a topic of growing importance for European (dis)integration research. This article investigates differentiated disintegration and the factors that facilitate member states’ counter-projects to core-EU integration trajectories. Drawing on the concept of policy entrepreneurship and based on an analysis of policy documents, we use the case of Austria to examine how the government coalition, the Austrian People’s Party, and their chairman, Sebastian Kurz, have shaped European governance of asylum and borders in the aftermath of the 2015–2016 crisis. We first show how the Austrian government performed a shift towards bilateralism and multilateralism outside the EU framework by using transnational party alliances. Second, we outline a policy discourse that justified Schengen-internal bordering based on asylum politics, which eventually served to delegitimize Schengen’s enlargement in 2022. The article contributes conceptually to understanding differentiated disintegration in the sector of migration and asylum, and points to potential drivers of this development.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference59 articles.
1. Adam, L., Berg, J., Trauner, F., Tuley, M., & Westerveen, L. (2016). The UK in justice and home affairs: The engaged outsider (Policy Brief No. 2016/6). Institute for European Studies. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301663047
2. Asderaki, F., & Markozani, E. (2022). The European asylum policy. Core state powers, flexibility and differentiated integration. In B. Leruth, S. Gänzle, & J. Trondal (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of differentiation in the European Union (pp. 325–339). Routledge.
3. Bodlos, A., & Plescia, C. (2018). The 2017 Austrian snap election: A shift rightward. West European Politics, 41(6), 1354–1363.
4. Brack, N., Coman, R., & Crespy, A. (2019). Sovereignty conflicts in the European Union. Les Cahiers du Cevipol, 4, 3–30.
5. Brekke, J.-P., & Staver, A. (2018). The renationalisation of migration policies in times of crisis: The case of Norway. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(13), 2163–2181.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献