Abstract
Recent comparative fiscal federalism work has noted how the US displays a mix of substantial federal capacity and no federal fiscal rules for sub-federal units as opposed to the EU’s mix of regulation and lack of capacity. The difference is explained by the lack of federal capacity in the EU case, which presumably creates a need for regulation. However, these studies are cross-sectional. This carries the obvious drawback of abstracting the actual political and historical processes that have given rise to the respective mixes of regulation and capacity in the two polities. In this article, I trace the historical process by which the specific mix of no rules and capacity became entrenched in the US in the second half of the 20th century and ask whether that political-economic history has any lessons for the EU today.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference55 articles.
1. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. (1987). Fiscal discipline in the federal system: National reform and the experience of the states (A-107). https://library.unt.edu/gpo/ACIR/Reports/policy/a-107.pdf
2. Beer, S. H. (1973). The modernization of American federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 3(2), 49–95.
3. Bordo, M. D., Markiewicz, A., & Jonung, L. (2011). A fiscal union for the euro: Somme lessons from history (NBER Working Paper No. 17380). National Bureau of Economic Research.
4. Congressional Research Service. (2019). Federal grants to state and local governments: A historical perspective on contemporary issues (CRS Report No. R40638). https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R40638
5. Cottarelli, C., & Guerguil, M. (2015). Designing a European fiscal union: Lessons from the experiences of fiscal federations. Routledge.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献