Fiscal Rules and Federal Capacity in American Fiscal History: Lessons for Europe?

Author:

Georgiou ChristakisORCID

Abstract

Recent comparative fiscal federalism work has noted how the US displays a mix of substantial federal capacity and no federal fiscal rules for sub-federal units as opposed to the EU’s mix of regulation and lack of capacity. The difference is explained by the lack of federal capacity in the EU case, which presumably creates a need for regulation. However, these studies are cross-sectional. This carries the obvious drawback of abstracting the actual political and historical processes that have given rise to the respective mixes of regulation and capacity in the two polities. In this article, I trace the historical process by which the specific mix of no rules and capacity became entrenched in the US in the second half of the 20th century and ask whether that political-economic history has any lessons for the EU today.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference55 articles.

1. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. (1987). Fiscal discipline in the federal system: National reform and the experience of the states (A-107). https://library.unt.edu/gpo/ACIR/Reports/policy/a-107.pdf

2. Beer, S. H. (1973). The modernization of American federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 3(2), 49–95.

3. Bordo, M. D., Markiewicz, A., & Jonung, L. (2011). A fiscal union for the euro: Somme lessons from history (NBER Working Paper No. 17380). National Bureau of Economic Research.

4. Congressional Research Service. (2019). Federal grants to state and local governments: A historical perspective on contemporary issues (CRS Report No. R40638). https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R40638

5. Cottarelli, C., & Guerguil, M. (2015). Designing a European fiscal union: Lessons from the experiences of fiscal federations. Routledge.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3