New Urbanism: Past, Present, and Future

Author:

Garde Ajay

Abstract

The New Urbanism, initially conceived as an anti-sprawl reform movement, evolved into a new paradigm in urban design. Recently, however, some researchers have argued that the popular appeal of New Urbanism has eroded, the movement has lost its significance, and critical research on the broader theme has tapered off. In response, this article investigates whether the movement has lost its currency and explores the future of New Urbanism in the context of contemporary circumstances of development. The article begins with a brief description of the conceptualization of New Urbanism as an exception to the development trends of the time. Collaborative efforts of its protagonists that have contributed to the integration of New Urbanist concepts into other programs, policies, and development regulations are presented in the next section to describe its expansion, to clarify its mainstreaming, and to call attention to its broader impact. The concluding section presents contemporary circumstances of development and changes that are intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic, including those related to the nation’s demographics, climate change, technological advances, rapid growth of the digital economy, and acceleration of e-commerce to explore the significance of New Urbanism for future development.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Urban Studies

Reference79 articles.

1. Audirac, I., & Shermyen, A. (1994). An evaluation of neotraditional design’s social prescription: Postmodern placebo or remedy for suburban malaise? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13(3), 161–173.

2. Badger, E. (2020, March 24). Density is normally good for us. That will be true after coronavirus, too. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/24/upshot/coronavirus-urban-density-risks.html

3. Bhattarai, A. (2020, May 7). Neiman Marcus files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/05/07/neiman-marcus-bankruptcy-chapter11

4. Boarnet, M. (2011). Longer view: A broader context for land use and travel behavior, and a research agenda. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(3), 197–213.

5. Boarnet, M., Forsyth, A., Day, K., & Oakes, M. (2011). The street level built environment and physical activity and walking: results of a predictive validity study for the Irvine Minnesota Inventory. Environment and Behavior, 43(6), 735–775.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3