Slow Rise of Trade Politicisation in the UK and Brexit

Author:

García María

Abstract

Since the Brexit referendum, the UK government has deployed a vision of ‘Global Britain’ revolving around trade agreements, yet, this was not a key issue in the referendum. Drawing on politicisation literature, we explore the absence of visible activism around future trade policy, in contrast to moderate activity around the EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). We identify actors in UK TTIP mobilisation and trace their actions post-referendum, revealing politicisation as campaigners participate in channels for attempting to influence future UK trade policy. In the presence of these channels and lack of full clarity on future policy, to date, recourse to visible mobilisation in the public space has not yet occurred. Tracing this dynamic process, intertwining Brexit and trade policy, enables us to understand how politicisation of one process affects another. Crucially, given the context of re-nationalisation of trade policy, it allows us to explore how politicisation is operationalised in the absence of one of the key conditions for politicisation suggested in the literature: the transfer of authority to a more remote level of governance.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference44 articles.

1. Bauer, M. (2015). Campaign-triggered mass collaboration in the EU’s online consultations: The ISDS-in-TTIP case. European View, 14(1), 121–129.

2. Bauer, M. (2016). Manufacturing discontent: The rise to power of anti-TTIP groups (ECIPE Paper 2/2016). Brussels: ECIPE.

3. Britain Stronger in Europe. (n.d.). Get the facts. Britain Stronger in Europe. Retrieved from https://www.strongerin.co.uk/get_the_facts

4. British Social Attitudes. (2016). Brexit: Litmus test or lightning rod? British Social Attitudes. Retrieved from https://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-34/brexit.aspx

5. Caiani, M., & Graziano, P. (2018). Europeanisation and social movements: The case of the Stop TTIP campaign. European Journal of Political Research, 57(4), 1031–1055.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Trading votes: what drives MEP support for trade liberalisation?;Journal of European Public Policy;2023-08-11

2. Post-Brexit trade policy in the UK: placebo policy-making?;Journal of European Public Policy;2023-07-26

3. Editorial: Politicization of EU Trade Policy Across Time and Space;Politics and Governance;2020-03-31

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3